
Originally Posted by
mechanical13
So, it does seem like we are experiencing a 'mass rfe' type scenario - several dozen folks on other forums have already received their RFEs, and several on this forum have too.
Odd enough, nearly all RFEs are for dates in 2009, and only primary applicant.
This brings me to an interesting question - could this be USCIS's strategy to build a case to move the date deep into 2009? It is my understanding that once a primary's GC has been approved, it is not possible to deny a dependent GC unless there is a statutory issue (medical, threat to the country, fraudulent BC etc). In a scenario where the dependent RFE has not been received and medicals expired, USCIS will be unable to approve their case, but the dependent should still be eligible for EAD/AP indefinitely until their date their current.
If this is in-fact the strategy, then USCIS will be able to afford 'immigration security' to those waiting in line, while simultaneously moving the dates twice as fast.
Am I being over optimistic about how much USCIS cares and this is more realistically a case of USCIS ineptitude, or is this really a possibility?
Gurus, would appreciate your thoughts.