Page 47 of 110 FirstFirst ... 3745464748495797 ... LastLast
Results 1,151 to 1,175 of 2734

Thread: Discussion On The Politics of Immigration Reform (Comprehensive Or Otherwise)

  1. #1151
    Quote Originally Posted by idiotic View Post
    Just to add.. "Do not think republicans will let legal immigration to be reformed too". Best example is fate of HR3012 lat year. Grassley and others will not let anything through. Better support Gang of 8 in their effort to completely overhaul immigration.
    You should brush up your info dear... HR 3012 case Grassley lifted the hold on the bill around July 2012, there are almost 5 months after that Why Sen.Reid don't want to file a cloture for HR 3012 at that time?? Democrats want Legals to be hostages for bargaining to give 11millions path to citizenship...HR 3012 was a republican bill. Grassley lifted the hold and Sen Reid, Schumer stalled it. Gang of 8 can only do something on the Senate but not in the House.

  2. #1152
    New Proposed amendment on border security could come as early as today.

    http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/l...,2419766.story

  3. #1153
    Quote Originally Posted by immitime View Post
    You should brush up your info dear... HR 3012 case Grassley lifted the hold on the bill around July 2012, there are almost 5 months after that Why Sen.Reid don't want to file a cloture for HR 3012 at that time?? Democrats want Legals to be hostages for bargaining to give 11millions path to citizenship...HR 3012 was a republican bill. Grassley lifted the hold and Sen Reid, Schumer stalled it. Gang of 8 can only do something on the Senate but not in the House.
    Please point me the link which states Grassley lifted the hold. If it was the case no cloture was required. If there was another unknown senator holding up that bill it would have been another republican called sessions..

    Cloture is very expensive for Senate which will not be used unless it is really required. It is well known that democratic stratergy is to get every force behind one bill and push it through.

    The real people who do not want anything getting done is reps..

  4. #1154
    I count the foll Republicans who would support:

    4 of the Gang
    Kelly Ayotte
    John Hoeven
    Bob Corker
    Mark Kirk

    Potentially Murkowski, Hatch, Susan Collins, Rob Portman?

    NYT says this amendment might get 8 to 12 Republicans. I think that's excluding the Gang. So that might get you up to 70 in the Senate.

  5. #1155
    New Hoeven/Corker border security amendment being discussed in the senate.

    http://www.republican.senate.gov/pub...iew=agenda-day

    Hope this helps gain more republican support.
    TSC | PD: 04/22/2009 | RD: 02/09 | ND: 02/13 | Checks Cashed: 02/14 | NRD: 02/17 | Greened on : 09/06/2014

  6. #1156
    Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Reading PA
    Posts
    542
    Quote Originally Posted by abcx13 View Post
    I count the foll Republicans who would support:

    4 of the Gang
    Kelly Ayotte
    John Hoeven
    Bob Corker
    Mark Kirk

    Potentially Murkowski, Hatch, Susan Collins, Rob Portman?

    NYT says this amendment might get 8 to 12 Republicans. I think that's excluding the Gang. So that might get you up to 70 in the Senate.
    I just got this tweet

    "Ds believe they will hold caucus together, and if Corker is correct that 15 Rs may vote aye, Senate could pass immigration with 69 votes"

    It is interesting to see that the Democrats in the Judiciary Committee vehemently opposed the same provisions which they are now hailing. Unless they can agree to enforcement trigger before any form of legalization the Bill will most likely die in conference or never make it to conference at all.The current amendment is unlikely to be enough to placate the House

  7. #1157
    Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Reading PA
    Posts
    542
    To Viz/abcx and others who enjoy the game of politics-I found this interesting

    http://www.nationaljournal.com/congr...-bill-20130620

    If anything the GOP house caucus needs a new whip.Mr.Kevin McCarthy is losing vote after vote and embarrassing the Leadership

  8. #1158
    Not a fan of McCain ... but this clip proves he still has some of the same character that once made him the darling of so many independents.

    http://www.nbcnews.com/video/nbc-news/52266310
    I no longer provide calculations/predictions ever since whereismyGC.com was created.
    I do run this site only as an administrator. Our goal is to improve clarity of GC process to help people plan their lives better.
    Use the info at your risk. None of this is legal advice.

    Forum Glossary | Forum Rules and Guidelines | If your published post disappeared, check - Lies and Misinformation thread


  9. #1159
    Quote Originally Posted by trackright View Post
    New Hoeven/Corker border security amendment being discussed in the senate.

    http://www.republican.senate.gov/pub...iew=agenda-day

    Hope this helps gain more republican support.
    Cornyn amendment is defeated.

  10. #1160
    Quote Originally Posted by qesehmk View Post
    Not a fan of McCain ... but this clip proves he still has some of the same character that once made him the darling of so many independents.

    http://www.nbcnews.com/video/nbc-news/52266310
    You might want to watch the Schumer+Mccain vs Cronyn debate on floor.

    For tamil friends, it would remind senthil goundamani banana joke

    Schumer and Mcain repeatedly asking Cronyn the same question again and again (where is the money for amendments coming from) and Cronyn kept beating around the bush without answering it. Mccain got frustrated and told him "its simple first grade mathematics" Cronyn finally walked out of floor.

    On a related note, Cornyn came today on senate floor couple of hours back saying" I just took a closer look at the bill.. where is the money for the new border security amendment going to come from?".. Its very clear his true intentions is to just kill the bill..

  11. #1161
    It's amazing that cornyn is from texas (first state with minority majority) and yet so opposed to CIR. McCain on the other hand is from a state that is so anti immigrant and yet the old man is vehemently supporting the bill.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiotic View Post
    You might want to watch the Schumer+Mccain vs Cronyn debate on floor.

    For tamil friends, it would remind senthil goundamani banana joke

    Schumer and Mcain repeatedly asking Cronyn the same question again and again (where is the money for amendments coming from) and Cronyn kept beating around the bush without answering it. Mccain got frustrated and told him "its simple first grade mathematics" Cronyn finally walked out of floor.

    On a related note, Cornyn came today on senate floor couple of hours back saying" I just took a closer look at the bill.. where is the money for the new border security amendment going to come from?".. Its very clear his true intentions is to just kill the bill..
    I no longer provide calculations/predictions ever since whereismyGC.com was created.
    I do run this site only as an administrator. Our goal is to improve clarity of GC process to help people plan their lives better.
    Use the info at your risk. None of this is legal advice.

    Forum Glossary | Forum Rules and Guidelines | If your published post disappeared, check - Lies and Misinformation thread


  12. #1162
    Quote Originally Posted by qesehmk View Post
    It's amazing that cornyn is from texas (first state with minority majority) and yet so opposed to CIR. McCain on the other hand is from a state that is so anti immigrant and yet the old man is vehemently supporting the bill.
    The answer is "Tea Party" I guess. They are the ones who is the source of all problems in Congress today. Most are afraid of them..

  13. #1163
    Quote Originally Posted by idiotic View Post
    The answer is "Tea Party" I guess. They are the ones who is the source of all problems in Congress today. Most are afraid of them..
    My feeling is that amendment that they are discussing is not quite different than what Cornyn was asking. I think they should have tried harder than abandoning Cornyn so easily.

  14. #1164
    Quote Originally Posted by rupen86 View Post
    My feeling is that amendment that they are discussing is not quite different than what Cornyn was asking. I think they should have tried harder than abandoning Cornyn so easily.
    If you have watched the floor debates for the past few days and still think Cornyn is interested in improving the bill, good luck to you !!

  15. #1165
    Quote Originally Posted by rupen86 View Post
    My feeling is that amendment that they are discussing is not quite different than what Cornyn was asking. I think they should have tried harder than abandoning Cornyn so easily.
    It is very diff! There is no trigger. At some level I see why a trigger is overly punitive if you think illegals should eventually be legalized and allowed to come out of the shadows (personally, I think GC is ok but no citizenship), but I also sympathize with the Republican POV that without a trigger, there is no incentive for the Democrats to actually reduce illegal immigration (particularly if you/they think that illegals, if and when legalized again, are more likely to vote Democratic). That said, apprehensions are at all times high with Obama so I think the Republican fear might be somewhat misplaced. If anything, I think Republicans like illegal immigration more because big biz likes it and Reps are beholden to big biz. Maybe that's why Republicans don't want to legalize - as long as they stay in the shadows, illegals can be exploited for the benefit of big biz.

  16. #1166
    Quote Originally Posted by idiotic View Post
    If you have watched the floor debates for the past few days and still think Cornyn is interested in improving the bill, good luck to you !!
    Not to comment on whether he supports the bill, both sides are horsing around. Schumer did complain about the cost at first, the CBO report that shows a surplus is just a smoke screen - it's still a bad use of capital (remember 40% of illegals are visa overstays). It's just that Democrats are willing to capitulate and waste the $30b on a dumb fence and border security because that's the only way to get some Reps on board and pass the bill.

  17. #1167
    Quote Originally Posted by abcx13 View Post
    Not to comment on whether he supports the bill, both sides are horsing around. Schumer did complain about the cost at first, the CBO report that shows a surplus is just a smoke screen - it's still a bad use of capital (remember 40% of illegals are visa overstays). It's just that Democrats are willing to capitulate and waste the $30b on a dumb fence and border security because that's the only way to get some Reps on board and pass the bill.
    Completely agree.. It is dumb to build a literal human fence where even roads don't exist. The money is well spent on exit-entry system.
    Wastage of money and "big goverment" is completely against Republican principles and clearly the "tea party" favorites are those who is favoring both of these in this case.
    20k officers in southern borders is huge direct employment for ex-military returning back.. They do not need to be reskilled also.. I think that may be the real intention..
    Last edited by idiotic; 06-20-2013 at 07:12 PM.

  18. #1168
    Quote Originally Posted by abcx13 View Post
    Maybe that's why Republicans don't want to legalize - as long as they stay in the shadows, illegals can be exploited for the benefit of big biz.
    That is quite right - one very good reason why republicans as well as big business don't want to legalize. Illegal labor suppresses wages which big business is very happy with.
    I no longer provide calculations/predictions ever since whereismyGC.com was created.
    I do run this site only as an administrator. Our goal is to improve clarity of GC process to help people plan their lives better.
    Use the info at your risk. None of this is legal advice.

    Forum Glossary | Forum Rules and Guidelines | If your published post disappeared, check - Lies and Misinformation thread


  19. #1169
    Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Reading PA
    Posts
    542
    A couple of links for some lighter reading on immigration and the farm bill

    http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolit...the-nba-finals

    http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/06/20/top-l...arm-bill-vote/

  20. #1170
    Quote Originally Posted by gs1968 View Post
    A couple of links for some lighter reading on immigration and the farm bill

    http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolit...the-nba-finals

    http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/06/20/top-l...arm-bill-vote/
    MSNBC tells that Ted Cruz's father came into the country bending the rules by paying a bribe

  21. #1171
    Quote Originally Posted by qesehmk View Post
    That is quite right - one very good reason why republicans as well as big business don't want to legalize. Illegal labor suppresses wages which big business is very happy with.
    Then I don't see any incentive to help legal immigrants as well because even legal immigrants help in wage/salary suppression.

    Is there any incentive for anyone to pass this bill? For Republicans, yes: Vote bank!! Isn't vote bank politics big enough reason to pass it? Isn't this a low hanging fruit to repair their tarnished image among the immigrants? I just don't know what they want!

  22. #1172
    That is quite right. Nobody has real incentive to actually do CIR. In that sense the only true friend of immigration (legal or otherwise) is a good economy!
    Quote Originally Posted by axecapone View Post
    Then I don't see any incentive to help legal immigrants as well because even legal immigrants help in wage/salary suppression.

    Is there any incentive for anyone to pass this bill? For Republicans, yes: Vote bank!! Isn't vote bank politics big enough reason to pass it? Isn't this a low hanging fruit to repair their tarnished image among the immigrants? I just don't know what they want!
    I no longer provide calculations/predictions ever since whereismyGC.com was created.
    I do run this site only as an administrator. Our goal is to improve clarity of GC process to help people plan their lives better.
    Use the info at your risk. None of this is legal advice.

    Forum Glossary | Forum Rules and Guidelines | If your published post disappeared, check - Lies and Misinformation thread


  23. #1173
    Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Reading PA
    Posts
    542
    Another important breaking story-Why are they doing this?

    http://www.latintimes.com/articles/5...ghter-name.htm

    Can anybody confirm this as true?

  24. #1174

  25. #1175
    Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    1,564
    Quote Originally Posted by idiotic View Post
    MSNBC tells that Ted Cruz's father came into the country bending the rules by paying a bribe
    technically he bent the rules to get out of Cuba - not enter the US. He bribed a Cuban immigration officer to get his exit stamp.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •