Page 13 of 15 FirstFirst ... 31112131415 LastLast
Results 301 to 325 of 357

Thread: Prepare to file I485

  1. #301
    Pandit zenmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    127
    Quote Originally Posted by gc0907 View Post
    Yes MaidenName = Name before Marriage. It could be both First and Last name as in some parts on India they even change Firstname after marriage.
    Thanks gc0907 !

  2. #302
    Pandit zenmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    127
    Finally mailed all documents(signed forms/pp photos/marriage photos/medicals) to the lawyer.
    Will see when they file...
    I am not keeping any hopes on 1st Feb filing. They have been awfully slow for PERM/140 filings...

  3. #303
    thanks for the quick response. I have a birth certificate related follow up question. It seems that only the first name of my parents is appearing on my birth certificate even though my name includes the last name. Is this going to be an issue? thanks.

    Quote Originally Posted by Pundit Arjun View Post
    Randomax,

    Forget the medicals and get the other documents in line and be ready. Ramchan & Nishant has pretty much summed up all the required supporting documents.
    Check the posts #1 and #19 in this forum for the document list.

    You can get the medicals done as soon as you are eligible to get 485. But get your vaccination records in place. Good luck

    The medicals are valid only for 1 year and you can get an appointment within a week (MAX). I got an appointment in a day.

  4. #304
    Quote Originally Posted by randomax View Post
    thanks for the quick response. I have a birth certificate related follow up question. It seems that only the first name of my parents is appearing on my birth certificate even though my name includes the last name. Is this going to be an issue? thanks.
    My spouse and my birth certificate had the first names of our parents only. The attorney said that its not an issue since our names are actually expanded. However, we asked our parents to get the birth certificates with their last names included. We couldnt do that for our marriage certificate though (the officer was lazy and said that the last initial is enough).

    Anyways, as long as your name is fully expanded and clear, I dont see a major issue (just like my attorney said). Check with your attorney also.

  5. #305
    Pandit zenmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    127
    Quote Originally Posted by Kanmani View Post
    Zenmaster

    Please make sure your application reaches USCIS on or after Feb1. Alert you attorney that your PD is current from Feb 1

    Last month, many applications were mistakenly prefiled by the attorneys during this batch by batch PD movement. There is a special thread in trackitt for these prefilers.
    Oh boy ! That would be so bad.
    Anyways, thanks Kanmani... I'll make sure they don't mail early.
    By any chance are you able to find that trackitt link you were referring to ? Just curious to know why people made those mistakes

  6. #306
    thanks for the quick response!

    Quote Originally Posted by Pundit Arjun View Post
    My spouse and my birth certificate had the first names of our parents only. The attorney said that its not an issue since our names are actually expanded. However, we asked our parents to get the birth certificates with their last names included. We couldnt do that for our marriage certificate though (the officer was lazy and said that the last initial is enough).

    Anyways, as long as your name is fully expanded and clear, I dont see a major issue (just like my attorney said). Check with your attorney also.

  7. #307
    Quote Originally Posted by Pundit Arjun View Post
    It should be 3 sets. My attorney asked me 3 sets (Me, MyWife and Daughter), buddy.
    Thanks Arjun. What will be filing fee for kid under 14 years of age. Is it $1070 or $635.

  8. #308
    $635 seems to be the amount (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/usc...00b92ca60aRCRD) for the kid.

    Quote Originally Posted by June292009 View Post
    Thanks Arjun. What will be filing fee for kid under 14 years of age. Is it $1070 or $635.

  9. #309
    Quote Originally Posted by Pundit Arjun View Post
    $635 seems to be the amount (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/usc...00b92ca60aRCRD) for the kid.
    Thanks Again.

  10. #310
    Guru
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    825
    Quote Originally Posted by Pundit Arjun View Post
    $635 seems to be the amount (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/usc...00b92ca60aRCRD) for the kid.
    Question - if primary moves to EAD then in which status dependents are till they travel outside of US. Also in above case if they travel outside US and use AP to come back every one will be in parolee status right? ( even if primary chose to use H1 as work authorization?)

  11. #311
    Sorry, Sun. I have no idea . Lets wait for the response from other folks...

    Quote Originally Posted by suninphx View Post
    Question - if primary moves to EAD then in which status dependents are till they travel outside of US. Also in above case if they travel outside US and use AP to come back every one will be in parolee status right? ( even if primary chose to use H1 as work authorization?)

  12. #312
    I-485 question --- when you file for I-485 - does your passport need to be vaild for +6 months?

  13. #313
    Quote Originally Posted by waiting View Post
    I-485 question --- when you file for I-485 - does your passport need to be vaild for +6 months?
    - That's not true.

    But it is always advisable to have passport validity for more than 6+ months all the time...
    [I]EB3 PD: Dec/21/2007
    EB2 PD: April/01/2009
    Center : TSC
    485 MD: Nov/30/2011 (with lawyer covering letter requesting to convert/interfile/port with EB3 priority date to EB2 category)
    485 RD: Dec/1/2011. 485 ND: Dec/13/2011
    FP Walk in Done: Dec/27/2011. (FP App. Date: Jan/18/2011)
    EAD/AP: Feb/10/2012
    On June/22/2008 USCIS issued new (notice of approval) I140 with EB2 category and PD Dec/21/2007
    GC: Aug/19/2013

  14. #314
    Dependents depends on primary and not the opposite in case of H1(primary) and H4(dependent). Dependents actually have their own status. Say primary and dependents both are on H1 then if dependent uses AP then he/she becomes parolee and I doubt in any way primary becomes parolee.

    So logically I think the dependent's status shouldn't affect primary's status.

    This is only my understading and I don't have any source to back it.

    What did your attorney say?

    Quote Originally Posted by suninphx View Post
    Question - if primary moves to EAD then in which status dependents are till they travel outside of US. Also in above case if they travel outside US and use AP to come back every one will be in parolee status right? ( even if primary chose to use H1 as work authorization?)

    NSC - EB2I | PD: Sept, 2007 | RD: 03-Nov, 2011 | ND: 08-Nov, 2011 | FP Notice: 10-Dec,2011| FP Done: 30-Dec,2011
    EAD/AP(Approval Email): 09-Dec, 2011 | EAD/AP(Physical Card): 15-Dec, 2011
    GC(Approval Email): 27-Jan, 2012 | GC(Physical Card): 01-Feb, 2012


  15. #315
    Guru
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    825
    Quote Originally Posted by gc0907 View Post
    Dependents depends on primary and not the opposite in case of H1(primary) and H4(dependent). Dependents actually have their own status. Say primary and dependents both are on H1 then if dependent uses AP then he/she becomes parolee and I doubt in any way primary becomes parolee.

    So logically I think the dependent's status shouldn't affect primary's status.

    This is only my understading and I don't have any source to back it.

    What did your attorney say?
    Thanks!

    I was checking that for one of my friend. He is consulting his attorney and I will post here what attorney says.
    This is what my friend is planning to do:
    Once he gets EAD/AP he wants to move to another client. He then is planning to go to India in May and then come back using AP and continue using H1 as work authorization(not EAD). I dont know what advantages/disadvantages with this as I not started digging into those details yet.

  16. #316
    May be the links here may be helpful as well...

    Quote Originally Posted by suninphx View Post
    Thanks!

    I was checking that for one of my friend. He is consulting his attorney and I will post here what attorney says.
    This is what my friend is planning to do:
    Once he gets EAD/AP he wants to move to another client. He then is planning to go to India in May and then come back using AP and continue using H1 as work authorization(not EAD). I dont know what advantages/disadvantages with this as I not started digging into those details yet.

    NSC - EB2I | PD: Sept, 2007 | RD: 03-Nov, 2011 | ND: 08-Nov, 2011 | FP Notice: 10-Dec,2011| FP Done: 30-Dec,2011
    EAD/AP(Approval Email): 09-Dec, 2011 | EAD/AP(Physical Card): 15-Dec, 2011
    GC(Approval Email): 27-Jan, 2012 | GC(Physical Card): 01-Feb, 2012


  17. #317
    Guru
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    825
    Quote Originally Posted by gc0907 View Post
    May be the links here may be helpful as well...
    This is really good information. Thanks again!

  18. #318
    Pandit zenmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    127
    Quote Originally Posted by Kanmani View Post
    Zenmaster

    Please make sure your application reaches USCIS on or after Feb1. Alert you attorney that your PD is current from Feb 1

    Last month, many applications were mistakenly prefiled by the attorneys during this batch by batch PD movement. There is a special thread in trackitt for these prefilers.
    As expected, so far law firm has been waiting for evl/fees check from employer.
    Employer says he didn't get asked by law firm...
    Deadlocks as expected...
    I am atleast glad that i am following up on both of them(I hope to be able to file by end of next week )

    Why do para-legals act as if they were the Lords of All Creations ????????? !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  19. #319
    Yoda
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    369
    I hope the storm comes on Feb 3rd (so that we do nto have to spend a agonizing weekend). Also I hope it moves atleast 6 months.

    Quote Originally Posted by manubhai View Post
    Its the calm before the storm that is to come on Feb 3.

  20. #320
    Quote Originally Posted by skpanda View Post
    I hope the storm comes on Feb 3rd (so that we do nto have to spend a agonizing weekend). Also I hope it moves atleast 6 months.
    Is it likely to come on 3rd or 10th?

  21. #321
    Guru veni001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    South-West
    Posts
    1,053
    Quote Originally Posted by kkruna View Post
    Is it likely to come on 3rd or 10th?
    Lest likely by Feb 3rd, but certainly by Feb 10th.
    Not a Legal advice/opinion, please check with good immigration attorney.

  22. #322
    Q, any news from your source on VB?

  23. #323

    Lightbulb

    Our source is not in touch with last 2-3 months. But now that CO's number is publicly available, anybody can pick up the phone and talk to him. I hear he is a nice guy.

    Quote Originally Posted by kd2008 View Post
    Q, any news from your source on VB?
    I no longer provide calculations/predictions ever since whereismyGC.com was created.
    I do run this site only as an administrator. Our goal is to improve clarity of GC process to help people plan their lives better.
    Use the info at your risk. None of this is legal advice.

    Forum Glossary | Forum Rules and Guidelines | If your published post disappeared, check - Lies and Misinformation thread


  24. #324
    Q - are you being sarcastic

  25. #325

    Great news! Much needed regulatory reform underway!

    http://www.dhs.gov/ynews/fact-sheets...mmigrants.shtm

    DHS Reforms To Attract And Retain Highly Skilled Immigrants

    Release Date: January 31, 2012

    The President is deeply committed to fixing our broken immigration system so that it meets our 21st century national security and economic needs. As a part of comprehensive immigration reform, the President supports legislative measures that would attract and retain immigrants who create jobs and boost competitiveness here in the U.S., including creating a "Startup Visa," strengthening the H-1B program, and "stapling" green cards to the diplomas of certain foreign-born graduates in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields. Together these actions would help attract new businesses and new investment to the U.S. and ensure that the U.S. has the most skilled workforce in the world. In the meantime, the Obama Administration is working to make improvements in the areas where we can make a difference.

    As part of these ongoing efforts and in recognition of the one-year anniversary of the White House Startup America Initiative, the Department of Homeland Security today announced a series of administrative reforms which will be completed in the future. These reforms reflect the Administration's continuing commitment to attracting and retaining highly-skilled immigrants. These efforts are critical to continuing our economic recovery and encouraging job creation.

    In last week's State of the Union, President Obama noted that "Innovation is what America has always been about. Most new jobs are created in start-ups and small businesses." He also stated in his remarks in El Paso last May, "In recent years, a full 25 percent of high-tech startups in the United States were founded by immigrants, leading to more than 200,000 jobs in America." Echoing this, the President's Council on Jobs and Competitiveness stated in its recent report, "Highly skilled immigrants create jobs, they donŐt take jobs." The initiatives described below will serve to make the United States more attractive to highly-skilled foreign students and workers, thereby improving the competitiveness of U.S. companies in the world market and stimulating U.S. job creation.

    Expand eligibility for 17-month extension of optional practical training (OPT) for F-1 international students to include students with a prior degree in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM).

    Presently, an F-1 student may only engage in optional practical training (OPT) for 12 months. F-1 students who graduate in programs of study classified as STEM can obtain a 17-month extension of OPT as part of their F-1 status if the degree they were conferred is included on the DHS list of eligible STEM degree programs. This proposed change would expand eligibility for extension of OPT by including students with a STEM degree that is not the most recent degree the student has received. Furthermore, because of the dynamic nature of STEM related education and training, DHS will continue to review emerging fields for possible inclusion in the list of eligible STEM degree programs.

    Allow for additional part-time study for spouses of F-1 students and expand the number of Designated School Officials (DSOs) at schools certified by DHS to enroll international students.

    This regulatory reform would allow spouses of F-1 students to enroll in additional academic classes on a part-time basis while their spouse is pursuing full-time studies. Presently, under the current regulation, spouses may only take part-time vocational or recreational classes. Schools would also be given increased flexibility to determine the number of DSOs needed at their institution to meet both the administrative and guidance needs of students.

    Provide work authorization for spouses of certain H-1B holders.

    This proposed change to the current DHS regulation would allow certain spouses of H-1B visa holders to legally work while their visa holder spouse waits for his or her adjustment of status application to be adjudicated. Specifically, employment will be authorized for H-4 dependent spouses of principal H-1B visa holders who have begun the process of seeking lawful permanent resident status through employment after meeting a minimum period of H-1B status in the U.S. This effort will help retain talented professionals who are valued by U.S. employers and who seek to contribute to our economy.

    Allow outstanding professors and researchers to present a broader scope of evidence of academic achievement.

    This proposed change to the current DHS regulation would increase the types of evidence that employers can submit to demonstrate that a professor or researcher is among the very best in their field. Presently, applicants for the employment-based immigrant visa category of "outstanding professors and researchers" are limited to specific types of evidence listed by regulation. This would allow "comparable evidence" beyond the specifically articulated regulatory list. This change will harmonize the evidentiary standard for this category with the other exceptional ability immigrant visa categories.

    Harmonize rules to allow E-3 visa holders from Australia and H-1B1 visa holders from Singapore and Chile to continue working with their current employer for up to 240 days while their petitions for extension of status are pending.

    This proposed regulation would treat E-3 and H-1B1 visa holders the same as other employment-based H-1B and L-1 visa holders by allowing them to continue employment with their current employer for up to 240 days from the expiration of their authorized period of stay, if a petition to extend their status has been timely filed.

    Launch Entrepreneurs in Residence initiative

    On February 22, 2012, USCIS will launch its Entrepreneurs in Residence initiative with an Information Summit in Silicon Valley, CA, that will bring together high-level representatives from the entrepreneurial community, academia, and federal government agencies to discuss how to maximize current immigration laws' potential to attract foreign entrepreneurial talent. The Entrepreneurs in Residence initiative builds upon DHS's August announcement of efforts to promote startup enterprises and spur job creation. The Information Summit will focus on ensuring that immigration pathways for foreign entrepreneurs are clear and consistent, and better reflect today's business realities. The Summit will include a special recognition of outstanding contributions made by immigrant entrepreneurs to our nation's economic growth and prosperity. The input gathered at the summit will inform the work of the Entrepreneurs in Residence tactical team, which will bring business experts in-house to work alongside USCIS staff for a period of approximately 90 days. Following the summit, the tactical team will convene in Washington, DC to begin its work. To learn more about the summit, please visit Entrepreneurs in Residence Information Summit.

    This page was last reviewed/modified on January 31, 2012.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •