
Originally Posted by
qblogfan
We sent emails to local congress people and ask them to pay attention to the low consumption of EB visas in the Q1/Q2.
According to the law, CO should assign spillover on a quarter basis, but he is not doing that. His decision caused EB2 C&I addtional 6-9 months extra delay. I don't know whether you guys realized that or not. For example, if your PD is 5/10/2006 and you missed the summer of 2010. Due to Co's decision on yearly spillover, you had to wait to May or June 2011 to get your GC because EB2-I got stuck to 5/8/2006 for 9 months! Actually according to the law, you should have been greened in the first quarter of 2010!
I think CO knows this law, but it takes much efforts to get the statistics and he has to do more calculation every quarter. That can increase his work load significantly. Everybody wants to minimize his work load, but EB2 C&I are suffering more because of this!
One of our representatives sent an email to CO regarding this. CO said he will compensate EB2 C&I in the Q3 and Q4, but we are waiting for 6-9 months more! Why should EB2 C&I wait for 6-9 months more while they are rushing to approve EB1 and EB2 ROW in 2 months?
Allocation of “otherwise unused” numbers in accordance with Immigration
and Nationality Act (INA) Section 202(a)(5)
INA Section 202(a)(5) provides that if total demand in a calendar quarter
will be insufficient to use all available numbers in an Employment
preference, then the unused numbers may be made available without regard to
the annual per-country limits. Based on current levels of demand, there will
be otherwise unused numbers in the Employment First and Second preferences.