Page 176 of 313 FirstFirst ... 76126166174175176177178186226276 ... LastLast
Results 4,376 to 4,400 of 7812

Thread: EB2 Predictions (Rather Calculations) - 2011

  1. #4376
    Something off the topic: I think the other reason for the huge number of Korean applicants is that a large number of Korean students are studying in the graduate schools in US. The number of Korean students is very close to Chinese/Indian students in US. I heard the average income in South Korea is pretty high, but the living cost is even higher. Every immigrant just wants to have a better life here, it's understandable.

    Quote Originally Posted by nishant2200 View Post
    imdeng, a Korean co-worker tells me of wide spread fraud by Korean companiea here, who are twisting tweaking stuff n Koreans working crazy long hours to get their EB2s. Too much detail don't know, but for sure that explains high EB usage by Korea.

  2. #4377
    If the objective of the BTM is to build a pipeline for next spillover season then it does not make sense to keep different PDs for India and China since they will come together during spillover season anyway. If there would be a BTM then I imagine it would have the same PD for India and China. There is really no reason to keep them different and add another reason of complexity.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kanmani View Post
    If it is so, and If Uscis look into the I140 approval statistics to discuss with Dos for moving dates , I dont think they combine I&C data for decision.
    I guess , I &C will get diff cut off dates even if it is 1 year movement .

  3. #4378
    Guru Spectator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    A Galaxy Far far Away
    Posts
    3,337
    Quote Originally Posted by Kanmani View Post
    Nishant

    Is it the demand includes China figues too?

    If it is so, and If Uscis look into the I140 approval statistics to discuss with Dos for moving dates , I dont think they combine I&C data for decision.

    I guess , I &C will get diff cut off dates even if it is 1 year movement .
    Kanmani,

    I understand why you are saying that, but since those numbers could only be allocated during spillover season, wouldn't they have to share the same Cut Off date?

    In that case, combining China & India totals presents no problems. I agree China and India will have different Cut Off Dates leading up to the FY2012 spillover season.
    Without an irritant, there can be no pearl.

  4. #4379
    Total EB2-China demand before 1/1/2008 should be around 3k.

    I also calculated the EB2-China demand before 6/30/2008 should be around 5k.

    I think it's possible EB-2 China will get ahead of EB-2 India during the first 2 or 3 quarters, but still the yearly visa number for China can not meet the yearly demand. We will have to rely on spillover in the next summer.


    Quote Originally Posted by Spectator View Post
    Kanmani,

    I understand why you are saying that, but since those numbers could only be allocated during spillover season, wouldn't they have to share the same Cut Off date?

    In that case, combining China & India totals presents no problems. I agree China and India will have different Cut Off Dates leading up to the FY2012 spillover season.

  5. #4380
    Quote Originally Posted by nishant2200 View Post
    Veni, qblogfan, I made some adjustments. Thanks for feedback. I kind of wanted to get hands dirty and get a feel of things myself, for personal satisfaction and education.

    I understand the model of Spec, where in since PERM certifications are same, we are projecting similar trend. Still for academic sake, I would like to further refine this simple model I earlier thought. Just based on simple PERM data. I adjusted the rate of PERM to 485 to 80% ( I had earlier thought 80% instead of 90% but thought maybe I am being too negative, but after being pointed out the Spec’s projection model and qblogfan’s calculation, I think 80% is good enough), and also downed the dependent to 2.04 from 2.2.

    Upto End of month year (cumulative) -- PERMs -- EB2 split -- 80% factor -- 2.04 dependant factor and hence the demand generated for movement until this end of month date

    August 2007 -- 5,248 -- 3,411 -- 2,729 -- 5,567
    September 2007 -- 7,541 -- 4,902 -- 3,922 -- 8,001
    October 2007 -- 10,167 -- 6,608 -- 5,286 -- 10,784
    November 2007 -- 12,600 -- 8,190 -- 6,552 -- 13,366
    December 2007 -- 14,846 -- 9,650 -- 7,720 -- 15,748

    BTM upto Jan 1st, 2008 would yield 15,748 demand. For below 2008, I am assuming 70:30 split for EB2

    January 2008 -- 17,743 -- 11,678 -- 9,342 -- 19,058
    February 2008 -- 20,473 -- 13,589 -- 10,871 -- 22,177
    March 2008 -- 22,716 -- 15,159 -- 12,127 -- 24,739
    April 15th 2008 -- 24,072 -- 16,109 -- 12,887 -- 26,289
    April 30th 2008 -- 25,429 -- 17,058 -- 13,646 -- 27,839
    May 2008 -- 27,939 -- 18,815 -- 15,052 -- 30,706
    June 2008 -- 30,073 -- 20,309 -- 16,247 -- 33,143

    BTM upto April 15th 2008 would yield 26k demand, and upto June 2008 33k demand.

    Hence scenarios:

    BTM to Jan 1st 2008: 15.5k + 6k porting = 21.5k demand
    BTM to April 15th 2008: 26k + 6k porting = 32k demand
    BTM to July 1st 2008: 33k + 6k porting = 39k demand

    qblogfan, for reasons unknown to my own mind, I too get a feeling of April 15th 2008, same as you. Sometimes, matters of the heart, cannot really be understood by mind, and have no scientific explanation.

    Now if we say that FY 2012 demand generation fresh intake would be based on SOFAD of FY 2011, and if FY 2011 SOFAD is around 35k which it looks like based on recent FOIA - invoke - cause effect news, then at least Q1 2008 sounds very plausible.

    At this point, I feel that anyone upto Jan 1st, 2008, should be almost certain of a green card in FY 2012, while upto April 15th 2008 to July 1st 2008, may get EAD for certain. When the fresh intake will be taken for the above to happen, that if the 19k left for September news is true, may happen next bulletin, and if that news is not true, then may "start" in around Q3 beginning or late Q2 in FY 2012.

    Quote Originally Posted by nishant2200 View Post
    Veni, qblogfan, I made some adjustments. Thanks for feedback. I kind of wanted to get hands dirty and get a feel of things myself, for personal satisfaction and education.

    I understand the model of Spec, where in since PERM certifications are same, we are projecting similar trend. Still for academic sake, I would like to further refine this simple model I earlier thought. Just based on simple PERM data. I adjusted the rate of PERM to 485 to 80% ( I had earlier thought 80% instead of 90% but thought maybe I am being too negative, but after being pointed out the Spec’s projection model and qblogfan’s calculation, I think 80% is good enough), and also downed the dependent to 2.04 from 2.2.

    Upto End of month year (cumulative) -- PERMs -- EB2 split -- 80% factor -- 2.04 dependant factor and hence the demand generated for movement until this end of month date

    August 2007 -- 5,248 -- 3,411 -- 2,729 -- 5,567
    September 2007 -- 7,541 -- 4,902 -- 3,922 -- 8,001
    October 2007 -- 10,167 -- 6,608 -- 5,286 -- 10,784
    November 2007 -- 12,600 -- 8,190 -- 6,552 -- 13,366
    December 2007 -- 14,846 -- 9,650 -- 7,720 -- 15,748

    BTM upto Jan 1st, 2008 would yield 15,748 demand. For below 2008, I am assuming 70:30 split for EB2

    January 2008 -- 17,743 -- 11,678 -- 9,342 -- 19,058
    February 2008 -- 20,473 -- 13,589 -- 10,871 -- 22,177
    March 2008 -- 22,716 -- 15,159 -- 12,127 -- 24,739
    April 15th 2008 -- 24,072 -- 16,109 -- 12,887 -- 26,289
    April 30th 2008 -- 25,429 -- 17,058 -- 13,646 -- 27,839
    May 2008 -- 27,939 -- 18,815 -- 15,052 -- 30,706
    June 2008 -- 30,073 -- 20,309 -- 16,247 -- 33,143

    BTM upto April 15th 2008 would yield 26k demand, and upto June 2008 33k demand.

    Hence scenarios:

    BTM to Jan 1st 2008: 15.5k + 6k porting = 21.5k demand
    BTM to April 15th 2008: 26k + 6k porting = 32k demand
    BTM to July 1st 2008: 33k + 6k porting = 39k demand

    qblogfan, for reasons unknown to my own mind, I too get a feeling of April 15th 2008, same as you. Sometimes, matters of the heart, cannot really be understood by mind, and have no scientific explanation.

    Now if we say that FY 2012 demand generation fresh intake would be based on SOFAD of FY 2011, and if FY 2011 SOFAD is around 35k which it looks like based on recent FOIA - invoke - cause effect news, then at least Q1 2008 sounds very plausible.

    At this point, I feel that anyone upto Jan 1st, 2008, should be almost certain of a green card in FY 2012, while upto April 15th 2008 to July 1st 2008, may get EAD for certain. When the fresh intake will be taken for the above to happen, that if the 19k left for September news is true, may happen next bulletin, and if that news is not true, then may "start" in around Q3 beginning or late Q2 in FY 2012.
    Nishant,
    Calculations look pretty neat according to the numbers available.

    1) In 2007, from previous inventory, i see that there are average ~2000 pending applicants/months for IC ( July is unusual as lot more used some others labor certs) with many labors being substitutes ( from my friends sample, 50% are substitutes).
    2) If i look at my Masters friends, many people got married to fellow students ( especially girls), 80 to 90% of those labors/I140 did not/will not convert to 485's ( we can consider most of them are Girls)
    3) My friends/peers close to 100 students community and around 30H1B friends who did not file/used labors till July 2007 -- only 10-15 of us did not get a chance to file I-485 and almost 90% of remaining people got their GC's already.

    Looking at above personal sample - i am feeling 33k from August'2007 to June'2008 is little more??
    Probably my circle of friends are different?
    Does any one have this kind of experience?

    2.04 dependent factor is probably good number.

  6. #4381
    imdeng, qblogfan, Yes, me too not having any problems with any group or country. It is what it is, just knowing information helps in planning our lives and better prepared, as is the motto of this forum. qblogfan, I agree with your point about students from K, in my time at university, lots of graduate students almost equaling I were from K, and most of them took lot of smoke breaks below the library . My co-worker tells me it's a very common scene along all US universities.

    Kanmani, the numbers are for I and C combined. Thanks to Spectator for having the base data compiled to allow further interpretations like this. I agree that C has much less demand and they would be in much better place if not for starvation due to backlogged I. So they may be in a forward date already next year before SO, but in SO season, as well all know, the assignment of visas is strictly in PD order, so I would like to say, they will be pegged at a same date as India, and hence, to make things simpler, I think the BTM will also be for a same date for I and C.

    grnwtg, I agree with your thoughts. Even one of my friends recently married a citizen. And also other points you mentioned. Basically, people realize the problems and are trying to work their way around them. This is human behavior, to adapt and survive! My figures admittedly are on high side, but I like to be conservative. We may introduce one more factor into the final column, called hardship factor, maybe say a 0.9, and say the real figure is only 90% of the last column. That would make the 33k a 29.7k and added with porting, would equal the 35k approximated by qblogfan.

    I also said my thoughts about people with Jan 1st 2008, getting GC for almost sure, while after that, EAD for sure, because of my feeling that next year, actual SOFAD might be less, because of various factors, like backlog reduction of EB1 & EB2 ROW, policy favoring EB5, economy being bit better than this year, Porting gaining a bit of a traction because of people having qualified due to side by side education or gaining in experience, people in EB1 and EB2 NIW learning from this year's scrutiny and being better prepared... and so on, more maybe thought. But a 20k SOFAD seems to be very certain inspite of all this, hence I thought until Jan 1st 2008, very good chance.
    Last edited by nishant2200; 07-18-2011 at 09:51 AM.

  7. #4382
    Expecting BTM in septemeber bulletin may be stretch, as per the information posted CO said once Aug15th 2007 is reached then there will be considerations for intake.

    so, If infact the dates will move to Aug15 in next bulletin, may be then BTM can be expected in the following month.

  8. #4383
    Sensei familyguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    84
    Guys, not sure if I missed something, but is the source reliable? are we over reacting? Few days ago when the bulletin was pulled back there were rumors saying that the date will be moved to April 2008.. is this the same guy who is saying that there are 19K visas left?

    Quote Originally Posted by bieber View Post
    Expecting BTM in septemeber bulletin may be stretch, as per the information posted CO said once Aug15th 2007 is reached then there will be considerations for intake.

    so, If infact the dates will move to Aug15 in next bulletin, may be then BTM can be expected in the following month.

  9. #4384
    The other thing I want to add is that many NIW applicants have got their GC through EB1. As far as I know, many Chinese NIW applicants published more papers during the waiting and upgraded to EB1. It's possible the real demand is smaller than our expectation. I agree that 20k SOFAD is the least number we can get next year.

    Keep fingers crossed.

    Quote Originally Posted by nishant2200 View Post
    imdeng, qblogfan, Yes, me too not having any problems with any group or country. It is what it is, just knowing information helps in planning our lives and better prepared, as is the motto of this forum. qblogfan, I agree with your point about students from K, in my time at university, lots of graduate students almost equaling I were from K, and most of them took lot of smoke breaks below the library . My co-worker tells me it's a very common scene along all US universities.

    Kanmani, the numbers are for I and C combined. Thanks to Spectator for having the base data compiled to allow further interpretations like this. I agree that C has much less demand and they would be in much better place if not for starvation due to backlogged I. So they may be in a forward date already next year before SO, but in SO season, as well all know, the assignment of visas is strictly in PD order, so I would like to say, they will be pegged at a same date as India, and hence, to make things simpler, I think the BTM will also be for a same date for I and C.

    grnwtg, I agree with your thoughts. Even one of my friends recently married a citizen. And also other points you mentioned. Basically, people realize the problems and are trying to work their way around them. This is human behavior, to adapt and survive! My figures admittedly are on high side, but I like to be conservative. We may introduce one more factor into the final column, called hardship factor, maybe say a 0.9, and say the real figure is only 90% of the last column. That would make the 33k a 29.7k and added with porting, would equal the 35k approximated by qblogfan.

    I also said my thoughts about people with Jan 1st 2008, getting GC for almost sure, while after that, EAD for sure, because of my feeling that next year, actual SOFAD might be less, because of various factors, like backlog reduction of EB1 & EB2 ROW, policy favoring EB5, economy being bit better than this year, Porting gaining a bit of a traction because of people having qualified due to side by side education or gaining in experience, people in EB1 and EB2 NIW learning from this year's scrutiny and being better prepared... and so on, more maybe thought. But a 20k SOFAD seems to be very certain inspite of all this, hence I thought until Jan 1st 2008, very good chance.

  10. #4385
    I think it is reliable. This guy/girl emailed Mr. CO and this information is from the email.

    Last time the rumor about VB typo was a joke and nobody was serious about it.

    Quote Originally Posted by familyguy View Post
    Guys, not sure if I missed something, but is the source reliable? are we over reacting? Few days ago when the bulletin was pulled back there were rumors saying that the date will be moved to April 2008.. is this the same guy who is saying that there are 19K visas left?

  11. #4386
    Like a lot of us, s/he was hoping it was a typo when the August VB was out.
    NO, somebody else dug out 19k.
    Quote Originally Posted by familyguy View Post
    Guys, not sure if I missed something, but is the source reliable? are we over reacting? Few days ago when the bulletin was pulled back there were rumors saying that the date will be moved to April 2008.. is this the same guy who is saying that there are 19K visas left?

  12. #4387
    I am not sure its reliable at all.It was way off mark with Aug prediction.It predicted massive movement in August.
    Q,Spec,Veni and Teddy do a much better job here backed with solid data and stats.

  13. #4388
    Friends ... i wouldn't have quoted the chiense source had i not sensed some credibility. We will know better in September of course.
    Quote Originally Posted by iamdeb View Post
    I am not sure its reliable at all.It was way off mark with Aug prediction.It predicted massive movement in August.
    Q,Spec,Veni and Teddy do a much better job here backed with solid data and stats.

    qbf why woud you say that? Next year EB1 and EB2ROW might come back roaring. Especially EB1? This year we received sofad not because the demand itself was low. But because that demand became backlogged in those 2 categories.
    Quote Originally Posted by qblogfan View Post
    I agree that 20k SOFAD is the least number we can get next year.
    I no longer provide calculations/predictions ever since whereismyGC.com was created.
    I do run this site only as an administrator. Our goal is to improve clarity of GC process to help people plan their lives better.
    Use the info at your risk. None of this is legal advice.

    Forum Glossary | Forum Rules and Guidelines | If your published post disappeared, check - Lies and Misinformation thread


  14. #4389
    Quote Originally Posted by qesehmk View Post
    This year we received sofad not because the demand itself was low. But because that demand became backlogged in those 2 categories.
    Q,

    EB1 demand was considerably low for fy2011, right? are you saying the 12k that CO announced in April was due to backlog not because of existing low demand and projecting low demand?

  15. #4390
    Just a Look at trackitt data for month of July '2011 - EB2 Approvals:
    India: 176
    China: 2
    rest of world: 11
    Total : 189

  16. #4391
    What would be the prediction for Cutoff date for September '2011 ?

  17. #4392
    Quote Originally Posted by qesehmk View Post
    Friends ... i wouldn't have quoted the chiense source had i not sensed some credibility. We will know better in September of course.



    qbf why woud you say that? Next year EB1 and EB2ROW might come back roaring. Especially EB1? This year we received sofad not because the demand itself was low. But because that demand became backlogged in those 2 categories.
    Q, I will take your word on it. But I am wondering why Mr. CO will reply to any persons e-mail. If such was the case then any of us could open up that communication channel to know about potential movements. Am I missing something here?

  18. #4393
    Quote Originally Posted by nishant2200 View Post
    imdeng, qblogfan, Yes, me too not having any problems with any group or country. It is what it is, just knowing information helps in planning our lives and better prepared, as is the motto of this forum. qblogfan, I agree with your point about students from K, in my time at university, lots of graduate students almost equaling I were from K, and most of them took lot of smoke breaks below the library . My co-worker tells me it's a very common scene along all US universities.

    Kanmani, the numbers are for I and C combined. Thanks to Spectator for having the base data compiled to allow further interpretations like this. I agree that C has much less demand and they would be in much better place if not for starvation due to backlogged I. So they may be in a forward date already next year before SO, but in SO season, as well all know, the assignment of visas is strictly in PD order, so I would like to say, they will be pegged at a same date as India, and hence, to make things simpler, I think the BTM will also be for a same date for I and C.

    grnwtg, I agree with your thoughts. Even one of my friends recently married a citizen. And also other points you mentioned. Basically, people realize the problems and are trying to work their way around them. This is human behavior, to adapt and survive! My figures admittedly are on high side, but I like to be conservative. We may introduce one more factor into the final column, called hardship factor, maybe say a 0.9, and say the real figure is only 90% of the last column. That would make the 33k a 29.7k and added with porting, would equal the 35k approximated by qblogfan.

    I also said my thoughts about people with Jan 1st 2008, getting GC for almost sure, while after that, EAD for sure, because of my feeling that next year, actual SOFAD might be less, because of various factors, like backlog reduction of EB1 & EB2 ROW, policy favoring EB5, economy being bit better than this year, Porting gaining a bit of a traction because of people having qualified due to side by side education or gaining in experience, people in EB1 and EB2 NIW learning from this year's scrutiny and being better prepared... and so on, more maybe thought. But a 20k SOFAD seems to be very certain inspite of all this, hence I thought until Jan 1st 2008, very good chance.
    Nishanth,

    Just curious if you have calculated any relation between trackit data whose 140 is approved and Priority date is between August'2007 to April'2008.
    I see that there are around 450 India of this kind of cases and 50 From China. And i believe most of them did not filed I485
    I am not sure how trackit data vs real data is related in past.

  19. #4394
    Quote Originally Posted by bieber View Post
    Q,

    EB1 demand was considerably low for fy2011, right? are you saying the 12k that CO announced in April was due to backlog not because of existing low demand and projecting low demand?
    The fundamental demand at labor 140 level is not any lower. It was denied/choked at 485 level. The one that was denied doesn't come back in 2012 to EB1. It could still come back to EB2ROW. The one that was choked i.e. backlogged (~6-8K) will come back in EB1 itself.


    Quote Originally Posted by iamdeb View Post
    Q, I will take your word on it. But I am wondering why Mr. CO will reply to any persons e-mail. If such was the case then any of us could open up that communication channel to know about potential movements. Am I missing something here?
    My gut feel more than anything. Maybe other chinese people on this forum can explain better; the google translation is difficult but what i read told me they have a standing mechanism - a legal one - to get info from VO. And I think its something different that FOIA (freedom of information act) that you and I also have.
    I no longer provide calculations/predictions ever since whereismyGC.com was created.
    I do run this site only as an administrator. Our goal is to improve clarity of GC process to help people plan their lives better.
    Use the info at your risk. None of this is legal advice.

    Forum Glossary | Forum Rules and Guidelines | If your published post disappeared, check - Lies and Misinformation thread


  20. #4395

    What does "New employer need to support AC21" mean?

    Quote Originally Posted by desi4green View Post
    Hi Q, T, V,..... experts.

    Have some questions for you guys

    First our situation: We are one of those folks that are part of July 2007 fiasco with our pd in Dec 2007. To explain our pd, we had two cases and one with EB3I 2006 and EB2I Dec 2007 and we had to pick one because of an RFE. With no hopes of EB3, we selected EB2 2007. We both have our EAD and AP and way past the 180 day period.

    Situation: Primary applicant now has a job offer in a different company with better pay + more but new company was told that they DON'T need to sponsor anything.
    New employer need to support AC21

    Problem: We are not sure whether the old company will pull out the I140 or not.
    As long as you file AC21, this shouldn't be an issue.

    What should we do. Is it better to let the new company know. From what I understand, At the 485 stage, we just need a job that matches the description and dont really need a company's sponshorship and hence we said "no" to requires sponsorship.
    New employer doesn't have to start from scratch, but should support AC21

    What happens if old company pulls out 140?As long as you file AC21, nothing happens.Otherwise you may receive RFE for employment offer/verification
    What happens if old company does not and USCIS asks for job verification letter later when they are ready to process the file? You have(with help from employer) to submit AC21 documentation

    What would you guys do?File for AC21 as soon as accepting new offer.
    Quote Originally Posted by veni001 View Post
    Please see my responses above!
    What does it mean when you say "New employer needs to support AC21". They do provide a immigration verification letter that states all the criteria except for detailed job description. Is involvement of new employer really required other than providing immigration verification letter + detailed job description?

    Thanks for your help in advance.

  21. #4396

    Post Interesting...

    This sounds interesting...could have been the consequence of their court-case last year.
    If some of our Chinese friends can confirm that would be great.

    VO communicating with people had happened before, CO's emails that got posted on the forum looked authentic too. Only thorn for me is the 'several months' movement that was speculated for August-VB, that did not happen. It could have been a translation error too, because it did move more than a month forward?

    Quote Originally Posted by qesehmk View Post
    ...they have a standing mechanism - a legal one - to get info from VO. And I think its something different that FOIA (freedom of information act) that you and I also have.

  22. #4397
    I that should be all you need from employer. Just like 485 - AC21 is a form filed by candidate not by the employer. It is another matter some employers keep filing 485 and keep paying all EAD and 131 expenses.

    Quote Originally Posted by desi4green View Post
    What does it mean when you say "New employer needs to support AC21". They do provide a immigration verification letter that states all the criteria except for detailed job description. Is involvement of new employer really required other than providing immigration verification letter + detailed job description?

    Thanks for your help in advance.
    Quote Originally Posted by leo07 View Post
    This sounds interesting...could have been the consequence of their court-case last year.
    If some of our Chinese friends can confirm that would be great.

    VO communicating with people had happened before, CO's emails that got posted on the forum looked authentic too. Only thorn for me is the 'several months' movement that was speculated for August-VB, that did not happen. It could have been a translation error too, because it did move more than a month forward?
    Thank you Leo. I think that is probably right. Again if the chinese source himself could come here and help us understand that would be best. If not anybody else who may have insight is welcome to explain.
    I no longer provide calculations/predictions ever since whereismyGC.com was created.
    I do run this site only as an administrator. Our goal is to improve clarity of GC process to help people plan their lives better.
    Use the info at your risk. None of this is legal advice.

    Forum Glossary | Forum Rules and Guidelines | If your published post disappeared, check - Lies and Misinformation thread


  23. #4398
    The news of "several months movement" was from a guy who had communications with Mr.CO. Nobody could verify his identity. Additionally that email was from Mr.CO three weeks before the VB, so it's possible Mr.Co changed his mind or something came up.

    The news of 19k visa left was from the Chinese NIU immigration organization, which has some credibility. People donated money to NIU and I think they are serious/responsible for what they say.

    Quote Originally Posted by leo07 View Post
    This sounds interesting...could have been the consequence of their court-case last year.
    If some of our Chinese friends can confirm that would be great.

    VO communicating with people had happened before, CO's emails that got posted on the forum looked authentic too. Only thorn for me is the 'several months' movement that was speculated for August-VB, that did not happen. It could have been a translation error too, because it did move more than a month forward?

  24. #4399
    Yes, I think my estimation of 20k is a little optimistic. Considering the increasing EB1/EB2 ROW I-140 pending numbers, we may see less than 20k next year. It will be tough next year. I hope it will not go too bad because there are still tons of Indian/Chinese 2008-2011 EB2 waiting for 485 submission.

    Quote Originally Posted by qesehmk View Post
    Friends ... i wouldn't have quoted the chiense source had i not sensed some credibility. We will know better in September of course.



    qbf why woud you say that? Next year EB1 and EB2ROW might come back roaring. Especially EB1? This year we received sofad not because the demand itself was low. But because that demand became backlogged in those 2 categories.

  25. #4400
    Thanks qblogfan!

    I was under the impression that both the news is from same source. If that's not true, my whole premise falls apart. Actually, I want it fall apart Thanks again!

    Quote Originally Posted by qblogfan View Post
    The news of "several months movement" was from a guy who had communications with Mr.CO. Nobody could verify his identity. Additionally that email was from Mr.CO three weeks before the VB, so it's possible Mr.Co changed his mind or something came up.

    The news of 19k visa left was from the Chinese NIU immigration organization, which has some credibility. People donated money to NIU and I think they are serious/responsible for what they say.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 13 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 13 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •