EB2I NSC | PD: 08/07/2009 | Forum Glossary
My Priority date is September 2009, I have downgraded from EB2 to EB3, assuming that the line will move faster... what happens to my EB2 I 140? Is it still valid, can I use it if EB2 moves faster?
My EB2 priority date is September 2009 and never filed 485, but I have downgraded to EB3 assuming I can surpass the line but now EB3 is retrogressed! Now what happens to my EB2 I140? Can I still use it if EB2 dates current for FA or filing dates?
If you have downgraded to EB3, the filing dates (DF) for EB3I is 01APR10. Why can't you file for I485 and start the AC21 180 day clock. You can get EAD+AP right? Am I missing anything?
Reg EB2I: If I was the CO, I would not bother to move the DF for EB2. EB2 demand is well documented with only a few percentage missing (like your case) from demand. So he is not going to gain or lose anything by moving the DF for EB2I. So moving the DF for EB2I will be low on his priority. He eventually will have to move it as the FA dates move. IMHO, I think you made the right decision to downgrade to EB3I. In my opinion this will get you EAD+AP faster. However, for GC I am not sure whether EB2I or EB3I is the best option for you or for me (late Nov 2009 PD).
Ah. Thanks. Oct-2018 to Jan-2019 Visa bulletins accepted the DF. So you have a chance in the next bulletin. Lets hope for the best. Keep your Birth Certificate and other docs for I-485 ready. I hope the window opens at least for a month so that people can get EAD+AP. The same arguments hold. They already have most of the demand in EB3I. So accepting the DF is not going to help or hurt them. Its 50/50. Praying to the almighty might sway the odds in your favor.
I understand that EB-3 downgrade process does not invalidate the prior EB-2 petition in the event the EB-3 downgrade is not successful. However, after successful porting I am unsure of EB-2 I140. It should remain unaffected. Only Chinese forums will have a definitive answer as they started doing this 2-3 years ago.
Also the new USCIS interviews are not fun, they are asking lot of questions based on Supplement J so better be ready to justify such category changes. I attended the interview last month, USCIS officer was not quite convinced with our category change (EB2 to Eb3) and issued RFE so think about a scenario where somebody is changing from EB2 to EB3 and then back to EB2. It will be difficult to justify.
Yes, we were caught off guard too, i thought the interview is just a formality but was totally wrong about it. Out officer told us that their new directive is to reject the cases without RFE but lot of it is depended on the individual officer and how you present the case in the interview. We were lucky to get RFE and not rejection.
What is your PD? Your profile says it is in 2001. If that's the case, you should have your GC or citizenship by now
https://www.shusterman.com/visa-bulletin-predictions/
Check-In with DOS’s Charlie Oppenheim (8-16-19)
Following a review of the dates listed in the September 2019 visa bulletin, the entire EB-3 category has immediately been made “unavailable” for the remainder of FY2019. This means that the annual limits have been reached on these categories and additional numbers are thus unavailable until the beginning of the next fiscal year. This status is not limited to EB-3 China and EB-3 India. It also includes, effective immediately, the EB-3 Worldwide, EB-3 El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras, EB-3 Mexico, Philippines, and EB-3 Vietnam categories.
In addition to this change, it is also important to flag that several other categories are listed as unavailable for the remainder of the fiscal year including the entirety of EB-4 and EB-4 Religious Workers categories, as well as EB-1 India. EB-1 China is not listed as unavailable but did retrogress 2.5 years due to increased demand.
Unless otherwise advised, applicants should still appear for a scheduled AOS interview. There is a possibility that an officer decides to not proceed with the interview and/or reschedules it for another time. If the interview moves forward and the application is deemed approvable, the officer will request a visa number and that request will subsequently be sent to Charlie Oppenheim’s “pending demand file” at the Department of State. Once this occurs, the visa number will be automatically authorized for use by USCIS, effective the first day of the month in which the applicant’s priority date becomes current.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)