Page 87 of 98 FirstFirst ... 3777858687888997 ... LastLast
Results 2,151 to 2,175 of 2436

Thread: Discussion of Bills that remove the Per Country Limits - H.R.3012, H,R. 213

  1. #2151
    yes - senators will absolutely not confirm holds/removal of them unless in the public domain via press release. i called sen grassley's office soon after ** announcement that he has agreed to remove the hold. A staffer said that the hold firmly remains in place...Literally 30 mins later, i saw an official statement on the senators website confirming the removal of the hold

  2. #2152
    WARNING...

    Please keep the discussion civil. Refrain from personal attacks. Please address others properly just as you wish they did you.
    I no longer provide calculations/predictions ever since whereismyGC.com was created.
    I do run this site only as an administrator. Our goal is to improve clarity of GC process to help people plan their lives better.
    Use the info at your risk. None of this is legal advice.

    Forum Glossary | Forum Rules and Guidelines | If your published post disappeared, check - Lies and Misinformation thread


  3. #2153
    So when is the STEM bill coming up for vote today?

    Also, from one of the posted articles it seems that it wasn't just axing DV that was the roadblock to reconciling the two versions, Schumer wanted to throw in some family reunification crap. The Dems are the ones derailing the bill by adding provisions for less-meritorious constituencies. This is politics of the lowest common denominator.

  4. #2154
    If cloture is needed, then there is zero chance it will come up this week. I agree with the 1-10% chance during the lame duck.

  5. #2155
    Smith's bill under debate as of now ...

  6. #2156
    Quote Originally Posted by kkruna View Post
    Smith's bill under debate as of now ...
    Watching CSPAN live online right now. Conyers really grasping at straws.

    Plain lies from George Miller. He has apparently never heard of PWDs.

    Impassioned defense from Gutierrez. Same BS argument that my parents were cab drivers implying that this is what America needs today.
    Last edited by abcx13; 09-20-2012 at 03:17 PM.

  7. #2157
    One more thing - does anyone find the Dems argument that Africans need DVs to come to this country slightly self-defeating? Aren't they indirectly implying that fewer Africans would come here on STEM visas? It's a rhetorical question, but I find it ironic that as the upholders of African immigration rights they are effectively insulting them and calling them less capable.
    Last edited by abcx13; 09-20-2012 at 03:50 PM.

  8. #2158
    Sorry if this has been answered already. But I found this on Oh law firm site. Actually it is in the text of Schumer's BRAINS Act..

    6. It allows temporary workers on high-skilled visas who have not violated their status to renew their visas from within the United States.

    Does this mean, if it passes we can get a stamp from within USA and not worry about stamping when we visit our home country?
    Category: EB2-I PD: 11/29/2010 I-485 RD: 10/28/2020 ND: 12/05/2020 EAD/AP RD: 12/24/2020 FP: 03/30/2021

  9. #2159
    Quote Originally Posted by feedmyback View Post
    Sorry if this has been answered already. But I found this on Oh law firm site. Actually it is in the text of Schumer's BRAINS Act..

    6. It allows temporary workers on high-skilled visas who have not violated their status to renew their visas from within the United States.

    Does this mean, if it passes we can get a stamp from within USA and not worry about stamping when we visit our home country?
    Yes, that is correct, if Schumer bill see light on present congress...Politics, Politics and POLITRICKS!

  10. #2160
    This is from OH law firm... I do not believe this, but some news about our H.R.3012

    http://www.immigration-law.com/

    For H.R. 3012, the business community and supporters of this bill apparently have worked hard to take it up on the Senate floor before the Senate goes into the recess. The Senate wants to wrap up most of its legislative work today so that the members of the Congress can go to their districts this weekend. This depends on passage of H.J. Res. 117 Continuing Resolution to fund the federal government for the next six month to prevent shut down of federal government at the end of this month. The House passed this bill and the Senate picked up this bill on the floor yesterday, but believe it or not, two Senators presented amendments before the Senate adjourned yesterday. The Senate will struggle with this bill today to keep their agenda to finish up their legislative works today. The Senate majority leader hopes that the Senate passes this bill and should they have time, the Senate wants to take up other Roll Call Vote bills as many as possible. It is uncertain whether H.R. 3012 can come within this plan, but even if yes, unless the Senate is able to pass the Continuing Resolutions without exhausting its entire time today, it is infeasible unless the unlikely scenario of unanimous consent that has been agreed up between the two party leaders. Please stay tuned.

  11. #2161
    Well the STEM bill failed in the House. Thanks Democrats for NOTHING.

  12. #2162
    Quote Originally Posted by abcx13 View Post
    Well the STEM bill failed in the House. Thanks Democrats for NOTHING.
    yeah.. yeah.. this was expected.. now next game is on in Senate with Schumer's Circus... one Republican Senator is enough to hold that bill then and there... So proved without any doubt... POLITRICKS!

  13. #2163
    Quote Originally Posted by immitime View Post
    yeah.. yeah.. this was expected.. now next game is on in Senate with Schumer's Circus... one Republican Senator is enough to hold that bill then and there... So proved without any doubt... POLITRICKS!
    Schumer's bill is now DOA because I don't think the Republicans will pass it. This is the Democrats playing Politricks.

  14. #2164
    Quote Originally Posted by abcx13 View Post
    One more thing - does anyone find the Dems argument that Africans need DVs to come to this country slightly self-defeating? Aren't they indirectly implying that fewer Africans would come here on STEM visas? It's a rhetorical question, but I find it ironic that as the upholders of African immigration rights they are effectively insulting them and calling them less capable.
    Africa is a pet issue for a minority of Reps from the Congressional Black Caucus. In this case though, I think Rep. Lee was just confused. She kept referring to family reunification, which is not what the Diversity Visa is meant for. I think Smith was very effective by keeping focus on the fact that DV entrants are keeping African American and Latino unemployment at levels significantly higher than the national average, and one of the other Reps said something about how their STEM bill would replace 3,000 DV Nigerian immigrants with 3,000 STEM Nigerian immigrants.

    In any case, this whole exercise is pointless, as the WH and Senate have a competing bill, so this has no legs whatsoever.
    NSC (originally TSC, transferred to NSC on 02/13/13) |-| PD - 04/25/08 |-| MD - 01/19/12 |-| RD - 01/27/12 |-| ND - 01/31/12 |-| Check Encashed - 02/02/12 |-| NRD - 02/04/12 |-| FPND - 02/09/12 |-| FPNRD - 02/17/12 |-| FP Early Walk-In - 02/24/12 |-| EAD/AP Approval & card production notice - 03/07/12 |-| EAD/AP RD - 03/12/12 |-| EAD/AP renewal RD - 12/11/12 |-| EAD/AP renewal approval - 01/22/13 |-| 485 Approval notice - 09/04/13 |-| GC RD - 09/11/13|

  15. #2165
    Quote Originally Posted by abcx13 View Post
    Schumer's bill is now DOA because I don't think the Republicans will pass it. This is the Democrats playing Politricks.
    Everywhere both the parties are playing POLITRICKS! without any shame.!

  16. #2166
    Quote Originally Posted by Pedro Gonzales View Post
    Africa is a pet issue for a minority of Reps from the Congressional Black Caucus. In this case though, I think Rep. Lee was just confused. She kept referring to family reunification, which is not what the Diversity Visa is meant for. I think Smith was very effective by keeping focus on the fact that DV entrants are keeping African American and Latino unemployment at levels significantly higher than the national average, and one of the other Reps said something about how their STEM bill would replace 3,000 DV Nigerian immigrants with 3,000 STEM Nigerian immigrants.

    In any case, this whole exercise is pointless, as the WH and Senate have a competing bill, so this has no legs whatsoever.
    The Republicans definitely had the more rational and convincing arguments. BTW, the DV costs the US $1.3 billion. That's $26k/person.

  17. #2167
    Quote Originally Posted by abcx13 View Post
    Well the STEM bill failed in the House. Thanks Democrats for NOTHING.
    As expected. When you have a divided legislature and there are two competing bills, don't expect anything. Besides, STEM wasn't going to help us out immediately. As sportsfan pointed out earlier, it would increase the negative spread between EB2I and EB3ROW thereby increasing bitterness all around. I for one, would rather not be more bitter. Onwards and upwards with HR3012.
    NSC (originally TSC, transferred to NSC on 02/13/13) |-| PD - 04/25/08 |-| MD - 01/19/12 |-| RD - 01/27/12 |-| ND - 01/31/12 |-| Check Encashed - 02/02/12 |-| NRD - 02/04/12 |-| FPND - 02/09/12 |-| FPNRD - 02/17/12 |-| FP Early Walk-In - 02/24/12 |-| EAD/AP Approval & card production notice - 03/07/12 |-| EAD/AP RD - 03/12/12 |-| EAD/AP renewal RD - 12/11/12 |-| EAD/AP renewal approval - 01/22/13 |-| 485 Approval notice - 09/04/13 |-| GC RD - 09/11/13|

  18. #2168
    Quote Originally Posted by Pedro Gonzales View Post
    As expected. When you have a divided legislature and there are two competing bills, don't expect anything. Besides, STEM wasn't going to help us out immediately. As sportsfan pointed out earlier, it would increase the negative spread between EB2I and EB3ROW thereby increasing bitterness all around. I for one, would rather not be more bitter. Onwards and upwards with HR3012.
    I think STEM would still have helped out because you would still need a MS certified job to qualify. Anyway, moot point.

  19. #2169
    Quote Originally Posted by abcx13 View Post
    I think STEM would still have helped out because you would still need a MS certified job to qualify. Anyway, moot point.
    In addition to that, this bill, even if it had passed the house, it would have gone nowhere in the senate. The same might be true but in the reverse for Schumer's BRAIN act.

  20. #2170
    Quote Originally Posted by abcx13 View Post
    I think STEM would still have helped out because you would still need a MS certified job to qualify. Anyway, moot point.
    Nothing really works.. unless if there is a legislation to increase the numbers for EB and FB category! and that is not going anywhere soon. only hope now is H.R.3012

  21. #2171

    Republican STEM visa bill fails

    http://www.computerworld.com/s/artic...isa_bill_fails

    What surprised me is that U.S. Rep. Zoe Lofgren is against the spillover of visas from STEM to other EB categories.

    ************************************************** *********
    U.S. Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), who introduced her own bill, said she could not support Smith's bill.

    "Although this bill ostensibly seeks to increase STEM visas, it appears to have another, in my opinion, more sinister purpose -- to actually reduce legal immigration levels," said Lofgren, in a statement.

    Lofgren cited the elimination of the diversity visa, but also faulted the bill for now allowing unused visas to be used to reduce green card backlogs.

    ************************************************** *********

  22. #2172
    luvspider - probably a typo - she faulted the bill for NOT... instead of now

  23. #2173
    Quote Originally Posted by gs1968 View Post
    To SaiBABa2010

    The Bill is in rough waters and hopefully can make it through.If it does not pass the House then Republicans will have no incentive to negotiate

    http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-va...ting-visa-bill

    On a different note the Diversity visas are probably not the Deal breaker here

    http://influencealley.nationaljourna...-immigrati.php

    This from the Senate Democrats website-there may be a vote-o-rama to allow Senators to leave town ASAP-hopefully 3012 is in the mix

    "We will begin consideration of the continuing resolution during Thursday’s session. We hope to reach an agreement to move up several roll call votes and avoid being in session this weekend in order to complete our work."

    They are unlikely to amend the CR 117 so I wonder what the other Bills under consideration are
    Smith / Zoe Lofgren proposals are out now and there is a very little chance for Schumer bill to pass through congress. Hopefully the tech lobbyists shift their energy towards 3012 and also hope it’s not really a lame duck session and our stuff gets passed during that period.

  24. #2174
    Quote Originally Posted by sportsfan33 View Post
    I do not believe this is accurate. I think STEM visas will mostly go to folks in EB3-ROW as Pedro has correctly pointed out. With country caps in place, EBx-I is going to get only a small share in these visas, and we will witness EB3-ROW becoming near current or have a wait time of only 2 to 3 years in very short time. I personally support the STEM bill, but I was extremely disappointed with the projected outcome and it will just increase the bitterness between the immigration communities further. If STEM is to be enacted, it needs to be coupled with country caps removal, otherwise the field is tilted even worse for us.
    I have gone through Pedro analysis.

    I do not see in any of the STEM proposals ( Only Schumer proposal is left now ) that existing STEM degree holders will not tested in the labor market again. Meaning, the STEM degree holders who are in EB3 now and want to jump to new STEM category they have to go through the PERM process again as their current job (PERM) doesn’t require a MS and the same will apply for few/all in EB2.

    I still believe that there will be a good spillover to EB2 at least in the 1st year of STEM.

    I know we are jumping the gun way ahead. But it’s always good if we get educate ourselves in a what IF scenario.

    As always I am open to correct myself if there is a good theory.

  25. #2175
    Quote Originally Posted by sportsfan33 View Post
    I do not think your analysis is correct. The STEM queue criterion is satisfied by STEM education...the job offer comes into the play as long as the candidate only works in the STEM field. Otherwise, there is no requirement for mandating a Masters. It may be a loophole, but it means that EB3-ROW would see most of the benefits.

    It is a moot point anyway. STEM effort was doomed to fail from the beginning.
    If it is just STEM education, then it is a flawed bill and I agree EB3s will overrun it. Especially if they allow SO to foreign STEM degree holders (though in theory this should only be after all US STEM holders have been processed). But reading between the lines, they require a STEM job, I think the requirements will be same as EB2 - it will also have to require a MS. Has anyone seen the actual text? Is the "job requires a Masters" for EB2 condition a USCIS admin law thing or is it codified?

    Anyway, I am hopeful for at least some kind of legislation passing the lame duck...ideally it will be HR3012. Honestly I think that is still the best bill and the most beneficial. And then when white immigrants from Europe are backlogged too, we might see some higher quotas.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •