Page 58 of 98 FirstFirst ... 848565758596068 ... LastLast
Results 1,426 to 1,450 of 2436

Thread: Discussion of Bills that remove the Per Country Limits - H.R.3012, H,R. 213

  1. #1426
    Sophomore
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    East Hanover NJ
    Posts
    44
    Heading of your post tells the story behind "This info was updated by a manager (known for *** advocacy efforts and respected name with in the organization)." Just kidding...

    Quote Originally Posted by JJcalifornian View Post
    Spreading the Rumors....

    There is a news that HR3012 would get reintroduced by April-May time frame with minimal changes as part of compromise talk with Sen Grassley. This is just a piece info which I thought to share with, I don't know anything beyond this.

  2. #1427
    Quote Originally Posted by kuku82 View Post
    gs....the article was never about HR3012.....the article was pointed out coz it could mean to help HR3012 indirectly.

    Anyway, this bill that Schumer is talking about is S.2233......its contents are not released on THOMAS yet.

    Source: Oh Law Firm
    Mike Lee (Sponsor of senate version of HR3012) is called as testimony to the hearing of S.2233

  3. #1428
    S. 2233: A bill to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to stimulate international tourism to the United States.
    http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s2233

  4. #1429
    Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Reading PA
    Posts
    542
    I had held a faint hope albeit wishful that the Senate might surprise us with unanimous passage of one of the myriad Bills with 3012 provisions but things are in cold storage for 3 weeks now. Today marks 4 months since House passage of H.R.3012

  5. #1430
    Quote Originally Posted by gs1968 View Post
    I had held a faint hope albeit wishful that the Senate might surprise us with unanimous passage of one of the myriad Bills with 3012 provisions but things are in cold storage for 3 weeks now. Today marks 4 months since House passage of H.R.3012
    I'd thought after the Rule XIV invocation, they'd just file cloture and be done with it. You'd think they could get 60 senators after the amzing bipartisan support this had in the House.

  6. #1431
    Quote Originally Posted by abcx13 View Post
    I'd thought after the Rule XIV invocation, they'd just file cloture and be done with it. You'd think they could get 60 senators after the amzing bipartisan support this had in the House.
    It could have been the pre-charted route. What complicated it was Irish trying to attach E3 to HR 3012 and Schumer and Co readily agreeing to that. Invoking cloture anyways is a time consuming process. By invoking rule 14, the bill bypassed the judiciary committee. Whether to invoke cloture or clear it through negotiations are the two options at this point.

  7. #1432
    Quote Originally Posted by gcq View Post
    It could have been the pre-charted route. What complicated it was Irish trying to attach E3 to HR 3012 and Schumer and Co readily agreeing to that. Invoking cloture anyways is a time consuming process. By invoking rule 14, the bill bypassed the judiciary committee. Whether to invoke cloture or clear it through negotiations are the two options at this point.
    Well, let's see. Supposedly now they've agreed to split up the two bills - Irish E3 and HR3012 - and I believe Grassley's objections were more to E3 and trying to reform the H1B program by piggybacking on HR3012. I don't know why they just don't take up the two bills separately and get done with it.

  8. #1433
    Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    1,564
    Quote Originally Posted by abcx13 View Post
    Well, let's see. Supposedly now they've agreed to split up the two bills - Irish E3 and HR3012 - and I believe Grassley's objections were more to E3 and trying to reform the H1B program by piggybacking on HR3012. I don't know why they just don't take up the two bills separately and get done with it.
    Grassley had reservations about 3012 as it stands .. even before this E3 thing started

  9. #1434
    This article on H.R. 3012 was posted by some user on **. It's a good article. Re-posting it here:

    http://www.nationaljournal.com/featu...d-out-20120315
    TSC || PD: Aug 08 2007 || Receive date: Nov 08 || EAD/AP: Jan 24 || RFE for birth certificate: Feb 27 || Response received: Mar 5 || CPO email: Mar 13

  10. #1435
    Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    1,564
    Quote Originally Posted by essenel View Post
    This article on H.R. 3012 was posted by some user on **. It's a good article. Re-posting it here:

    http://www.nationaljournal.com/featu...d-out-20120315
    the premise is good but its a badly written article. First they talk about the startup and the entrepreneurs, then they bring in HR3012 which has nothing to do with the issue the entrepreneurs are facing and then they say that even if HR3012 is passed, it won't help the entrepreneurs (which is true)... so why confuse the two issues.

  11. #1436
    Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Reading PA
    Posts
    542
    Information/news about this Bill has almost completely dried up but at least somebody at Microsoft still cares about this Bill

    http://www.informationweek.com/news/...news/232800248

    This is the only news alert that has shown up for me in the last 4 days-Thought I would share

  12. #1437
    Quote Originally Posted by gs1968 View Post
    Information/news about this Bill has almost completely dried up but at least somebody at Microsoft still cares about this Bill

    http://www.informationweek.com/news/...news/232800248

    This is the only news alert that has shown up for me in the last 4 days-Thought I would share
    At least a good thing in retrogression is that the Senators will know the real scale of backlog for EB2IC. Gives something for the lobbyists to show the Senators. I am sure if dates are showing up as May 2010, they may have good trouble in explaining the backlog to them as most of them are not aware of the intricate details why the dates are pushed artifically.

  13. #1438
    Quote Originally Posted by abcx13 View Post
    ..I believe Grassley's objections were more to E3 and trying to reform the H1B program by piggybacking on HR3012
    Absolutely not. If you read Grassley's amendment he struck out entire HR3012 and added his bill in it with addition of line of increasing country limit to 15% instead of existing 7% for employment categories. That's pretty much it

  14. #1439

  15. #1440
    Quote Originally Posted by Mavrick View Post
    After Jobs Act, Case turns focus to immigration

    http://www.baltimoresun.com/business...,5980942.story
    Doesn't mention anything abt HR3012.

  16. #1441
    Quote Originally Posted by abcx13 View Post
    Doesn't mention anything abt HR3012.
    http://www.marketwatch.com/story/sta...act-2012-04-05

  17. #1442
    Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Reading PA
    Posts
    542
    The Irish E-3 issue is still alive according to Irish Central although the article does not seem to reflect any real progress.

    http://www.irishcentral.com/news/Sco...146793745.html

    The comments section is interesting in that it claims Lamar Smith intends to oppose it if it reaches the House. Can other forum members provide a link to substantiate this?

  18. #1443
    Quote Originally Posted by gs1968 View Post
    The Irish E-3 issue is still alive according to Irish Central although the article does not seem to reflect any real progress.

    http://www.irishcentral.com/news/Sco...146793745.html

    The comments section is interesting in that it claims Lamar Smith intends to oppose it if it reaches the House. Can other forum members provide a link to substantiate this?
    E3 passing house was always an "IF". All what Irish E-3 is doing is slowing down the progress of HR 3012.

  19. #1444
    Quote Originally Posted by gcq View Post
    E3 passing house was always an "IF". All what Irish E-3 is doing is slowing down the progress of HR 3012.
    I think HR 3012 is dead now.

  20. #1445
    Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    1,564
    Quote Originally Posted by abcx13 View Post
    I think HR 3012 is dead now.
    Based on what ?

  21. #1446
    Quote Originally Posted by vizcard View Post
    Based on what ?
    Based on the fact that there has been NO movement for the past three months and news has died down over the past two weeks.

  22. #1447
    I think we should start pushing for this bill again for next few days. Senate will be back in session from Monday. Start contacting senators from your area (call/write letters/emails/twit/FB/ etc....even talk to house reps after talking to a senator to push for this bill..all we need is few republican senators support.
    Since Eb2 I/C has moved back to 2007, use that as a talking point.
    Link to Senators : http://www.senate.gov/general/contac...nators_cfm.cfm
    Thank you

  23. #1448
    Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    1,564
    Quote Originally Posted by abcx13 View Post
    Based on the fact that there has been NO movement for the past three months and news has died down over the past two weeks.
    Considering the political climate, priorities (JOBS bill, etc.) and just the manuveuring, I wouldn't say its dead. No news is good news in this regard.

  24. #1449
    Quote Originally Posted by vizcard View Post
    Considering the political climate, priorities (JOBS bill, etc.) and just the manuveuring, I wouldn't say its dead. No news is good news in this regard.
    I think you're being over-optimistic. If some compromise deal was to be reached, it would have been reached by now. The fact that nobody has been even talking about doesn't bode well.

  25. #1450
    Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    1,564
    Quote Originally Posted by abcx13 View Post
    I think you're being over-optimistic. If some compromise deal was to be reached, it would have been reached by now. The fact that nobody has been even talking about doesn't bode well.
    I might be optimistic by nature. But given the facts, my opinion is that it is not "dead". It may be on its way there but I don't believe it's dead right NOW.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •