Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 59

Thread: H1B Stamping

  1. #1

    Wink H1B Stamping

    I think let people put info about above n then can move to new thread in H1 related topics.

  2. #2

    Wink H1B Stamping

    All,


    One issue that affects most of us while waiting forthe dates to be current is the Stamping issue. We all know about the exhaustive scrutiny and sadism that ishappening these days. I have a few questions:


    1. The scrutiny seems to be extremely high for EmP-Vend-client models (EVC).
    Does this model violate H1B rules? If yes, why is the USCIS approving it here at the first place. (ie. After verifying all documents by issuing an RFE)

    2. This administrative processing seems robe a blackbox. No timeframe is given. Any suggestions on do's and dont's is greatly appreciated.

    3. People in similar situations, please post your experiences with the following information.
    - # of successful previous stampings
    - model (EVC or DCdirect client)
    - consulate name
    - date
    - response (successful/ RFE/ Admin Processing etc.)
    - post any other info that may he helpful

  3. #3
    As for whether EVC model is legal, it is legal. Of course USCIS came up with the infamous employer-employee memo which itself is illegal. As nobody has effectively challenged this memo in court, USCIS still uses the memo guidelines while adjudicating H1s.

    Why consulates has become so harsh on H1B candidates ? I suspect this is being done at the directive of Obama administration hoping to create more jobs here. Stamping was always unpredictable. Candidates were at the mercy of consulate officer always. Tough economy and Obama administration's efforts to create jobs had made it uglier.

  4. #4
    Obviously we cannot expect any law firm to file a class action lawsuit. Cos if they do that and win, they won't get to earn money on individual cases.

  5. #5
    gcq bingo! I think that memo itself is not quite legal because it is discriminatory. Yet another good place for advocacy in my opinion.

    Quote Originally Posted by gcq View Post
    As for whether EVC model is legal, it is legal. Of course USCIS came up with the infamous employer-employee memo which itself is illegal. As nobody has effectively challenged this memo in court, USCIS still uses the memo guidelines while adjudicating H1s.

    Why consulates has become so harsh on H1B candidates ? I suspect this is being done at the directive of Obama administration hoping to create more jobs here. Stamping was always unpredictable. Candidates were at the mercy of consulate officer always. Tough economy and Obama administration's efforts to create jobs had made it uglier.
    I no longer provide calculations/predictions ever since whereismyGC.com was created.
    I do run this site only as an administrator. Our goal is to improve clarity of GC process to help people plan their lives better.
    Use the info at your risk. None of this is legal advice.

    Forum Glossary | Forum Rules and Guidelines | If your published post disappeared, check - Lies and Misinformation thread


  6. #6
    Q,

    As normal immigrants what can we do in our capacity to make some noise about this?

  7. #7
    2007,

    The legality needs to be challenged on the ground that for McKinsey one doesn't have to prove such client relationship. For many other US based consulting company I believe this is NOT a requirement. ... why only discriminate IT consulting companies and that too especially based in India?

    I think this involves filing a lawsuit against USCIS. If we were to do it .... we would need some serious funding and a proper organization.


    Quote Originally Posted by 10102007 View Post
    Q,

    As normal immigrants what can we do in our capacity to make some noise about this?
    I no longer provide calculations/predictions ever since whereismyGC.com was created.
    I do run this site only as an administrator. Our goal is to improve clarity of GC process to help people plan their lives better.
    Use the info at your risk. None of this is legal advice.

    Forum Glossary | Forum Rules and Guidelines | If your published post disappeared, check - Lies and Misinformation thread


  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by qesehmk View Post

    If we were to do it .... we would need some serious funding and a proper organization.
    Ok there lies the problem. .

  9. #9
    Well its not a problem. I think we can do that if we wanted to - people on this site have frequently asked whether we accept donations. But to accept donations then I have to register as a non-profit and have a proper organization. Personally I am not yet at a stage where I can devote that much time and accept that level of commitment. Besides there are organizations like IV who are devoted to advocacy. I would certainly support them and I would encourage others to do so if these organizations take this issue up.

    On this site however our focus is establishing clarity. Sorry if you feel disappointed.

    Quote Originally Posted by 10102007 View Post
    Ok there lies the problem. .
    I no longer provide calculations/predictions ever since whereismyGC.com was created.
    I do run this site only as an administrator. Our goal is to improve clarity of GC process to help people plan their lives better.
    Use the info at your risk. None of this is legal advice.

    Forum Glossary | Forum Rules and Guidelines | If your published post disappeared, check - Lies and Misinformation thread


  10. #10
    Q,
    I'm not disappointed with your answer. For what you have donE already to the immigrant community, you deserve a billion thanks.

    It takes a lot if commitment, money power and group strength to achieve this and people have different priorities. I would have joined the crowd but would not have led one for the same reasons that you mentioned.

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by 10102007 View Post
    Q,

    As normal immigrants what can we do in our capacity to make some noise about this?
    From a legal stand point a lawsuit against USCIS will be successful. Reason ? This new employer-employee memo contradicts the basic employer-employee relation as set by the "common law". USCIS cannot have its own definition of employer-employee. It has to follow the standards of common law. That is why winning this lawsuit is a no-brainer.

    This lawsuit has to be brought up by some company/individual who is affected by this situation. Surprisingly most of the companies that are affected by this are not willing to take this step. AILA won't take up this issue unless somebody funds it. As far as AILA is concerned, they make more money when getting an H1 is burdensome for their clients.

    When this memo came out, large consulting companies ignored it because they thought only small companies in multi- layer contracts will be affected. Then consulates tightened H1 stamping process and large ones were affected too. Then regular american corporations ( read FTE companies ) thought it would affect only consulting companies. Consulates made it difficult for even regular companies to get an H1B stamp.

  12. #12
    so some one who got effected by this should be in US to file the case right... If they are effected they wont b in US anyways... what do you think...

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by soggadu View Post
    so some one who got effected by this should be in US to file the case right... If they are effected they wont b in US anyways... what do you think...
    That is the reason companies should fight this. When an employee himself is affected by this, he cannot remain in US.

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by gcq View Post
    From a legal stand point a lawsuit against USCIS will be successful. Reason ? This new employer-employee memo contradicts the basic employer-employee relation as set by the "common law". USCIS cannot have its own definition of employer-employee. It has to follow the standards of common law. That is why winning this lawsuit is a no-brainer.

    This lawsuit has to be brought up by some company/individual who is affected by this situation. Surprisingly most of the companies that are affected by this are not willing to take this step. AILA won't take up this issue unless somebody funds it. As far as AILA is concerned, they make more money when getting an H1 is burdensome for their clients.

    When this memo came out, large consulting companies ignored it because they thought only small companies in multi- layer contracts will be affected. Then consulates tightened H1 stamping process and large ones were affected too. Then regular american corporations ( read FTE companies ) thought it would affect only consulting companies. Consulates made it difficult for even regular companies to get an H1B stamp.
    AFAIK the company that filed the lawsuit on the memo lost it (I remember reading on IV / Trackitt). At the ground level the consulates are implementing the memo tooth and nail atleast for the smaller consulting companies. People who got their H1B extension prior to the memo should have had their cases grand fathered but that’s not the case. As soon as the magic combination of India + IT + consulting is seen 221G's are being issued. Frankly really nothing can be done, there are cases wherein H4's have been issued 221G and the cancellation / revocations have been done on the H1B case (I know firsthand about one such case wherein H4 denial triggered H1 cancellation request). So what we can do is to be judicious about our travel to home country, routine travel is best avoided, rather best invite your parents. People from larger American consulting companies are affected to a smaller extent; however we never know when that number might rise. This is another reason why we all wish the dates would move. PS - Iam a PWMB on H1B (IT Consulting) so I can feel the pain first hand.

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by gcq View Post
    That is the reason companies should fight this. When an employee himself is affected by this, he cannot remain in US.
    Can't seem to catch a break these days. No GC movement for the next few months. Until then can't go to India if one has to get stamping. Going elsewhere also is risky. Things are very depressing.

    Let me state that nobody forced me into this position Nor is someone stopping me fromgoing to India. It's my choice. Just venting out my frustration. Sorry.

  16. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by gcq View Post
    That is the reason companies should fight this. When an employee himself is affected by this, he cannot remain in US.
    Most companies like individuals like to stay away from hassles their only intent is to protect their business / loss of revenue. They rather like to work over-time to find replacements on GC's, TN Visa or by all other means. Unfortunately in this situation the employee and his family are the ones really suffering. It’s important to have all h1B extension work as compliant to the memo as possible. The era of multi layering is almost over as the requirement to prove that the petitioning company is supervising the day to day work of the employee.

  17. #17
    Sophomore
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    McKInney TX
    Posts
    29
    Myself:

    - # of successful previous stampings - ZERO
    - model (EVC or DCdirect client) - EVC (Consulting company)
    - consulate name - Delhi
    - date - 05/07/2009
    - response (successful/ RFE/ Admin Processing etc.) - Admin Processing. Kept my passport for 4 months. Finally received a letter from consulate that my file has been transfered to kentucky service location. Came back on H4 visa and got amended to h1.

    My Best Friend (i know this guy for last 14 years):
    - # of successful previous stampings - ZERO
    - model (EVC or DCdirect client) - EVC (Consulting company)
    - consulate name - Chennai
    - date - 04/07/2011
    - response (successful/ RFE/ Admin Processing etc.) - Admin Processing. Provided all the documents including client letter. Keep sending emails to consulate and they reply saying its still in admin processing, will take time. Luckily he is working from india for the same client.

    My Sister in law:
    - # of successful previous stampings - ZERO
    - model (EVC or DCdirect client) - EVC (Consulting company)
    - consulate name - Chennai
    - date - 05/27/2011
    - response (successful/ RFE/ Admin Processing etc.) - Admin Processing. She is working from India for the client.

    My Neighbour:
    - # of successful previous stampings - 1
    - model (EVC or DCdirect client) - Emphasis employee working for HP
    - consulate name - Chennai
    - date - 11/12/2010
    - response (successful/ RFE/ Admin Processing etc.) - Successful.


    Quote Originally Posted by 10102007 View Post
    All,
    Not to sidetrack but let us try to refocus here.

    One issue that affects most of us while waiting forthe dates to be current is the Stamping issue. We all know about the exhaustive scrutiny and sadism that ishappening these days. I have a few questions:


    1. The scrutiny seems to be extremely high for EmP-Vend-client models (EVC).
    Does this model violate H1B rules? If yes, why is the USCIS approving it here at the first place. (ie. After verifying all documents by issuing an RFE)

    2. This administrative processing seems robe a blackbox. No timeframe is given. Any suggestions on do's and dont's is greatly appreciated.

    3. People in similar situations, please post your experiences with the following information.
    - # of successful previous stampings
    - model (EVC or DCdirect client)
    - consulate name
    - date
    - response (successful/ RFE/ Admin Processing etc.)

    Gurus - please create a new thread as it will be very helpful.

  18. #18
    Sophomore
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    McKInney TX
    Posts
    29
    Soggadu,

    I am affected by this EE relationship policy. My h1b transfer filed in march 2008 was denied in march 2009 after an RFE (in september 2008) on a EE relationship.
    I was working for a top beverage company and they have a corporate policy that they cannot provide client letter to contractors (inspite i worked there for 3 years).

    After denial i consulted rajiv s khanna and he adviced me to apply for another h1b via another company and in premium processing. I was parially lucky as i got approval but with consular processing (as my I-94 expired on august 2008)

    Lost money, time, my previous priority date etc because of this mess.

    Quote Originally Posted by soggadu View Post
    so some one who got effected by this should be in US to file the case right... If they are effected they wont b in US anyways... what do you think...

  19. #19
    http://www.murthy.com/news/n_im221g.html

    Ineresting point. Murthy says even though we may have all our papers in order when we go for stamping, we may get Admin Processing because of the employer.

    Please read the article and share your thoughts.

    Is there a way to know if our employers are not in the bad books?

  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by 10102007 View Post
    http://www.murthy.com/news/n_im221g.html

    Ineresting point. Murthy says even though we may have all our papers in order when we go for stamping, we may get Admin Processing because of the employer.

    Please read the article and share your thoughts.

    Is there a way to know if our employers are not in the bad books?
    It is interesting that consulates are denying visas for some reason. The best way to check your luck with visa stamping is to know whether employees from your company had successful visa stamping recently.

  21. #21

    Unhappy

    Hi All...this is regarding H1b visa stamping....Planning to visit india in Sep.As my h1b expires in Jan 2012, company informed me to get H1b extended before travelling to india and i got the extension also approved today...BUT there was an issue...USCIS gave my extension Approval date from JAn 2012 till Jan2015. So technically i have, two I-797 now...i am confused now which I-797 shuld i submit when i go for visa...will having 2 i-797 be issue for them to issue visa...did any one in this form faced this issue b4...please let me know what to do

  22. #22
    Guru veni001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    South-West
    Posts
    1,053
    Quote Originally Posted by mesan123 View Post
    Hi All...this is regarding H1b visa stamping....Planning to visit india in Sep.As my h1b expires in Jan 2012, company informed me to get H1b extended before travelling to india and i got the extension also approved today...BUT there was an issue...USCIS gave my extension Approval date from JAn 2012 till Jan2015. So technically i have, two I-797 now...i am confused now which I-797 shuld i submit when i go for visa...will having 2 i-797 be issue for them to issue visa...did any one in this form faced this issue b4...please let me know what to do
    mesan,
    Submit both, shouldn't have any issue.

  23. #23
    Veni

    Sorry I meant to respond to you but havent been able to so far. Pls bear w me for a day more max.
    Quote Originally Posted by veni001 View Post
    Q,
    Another point to note is 72% of the ROW-M-P PERM Certifications from FY2011(Q1-Q3) are with PD2010 or before.
    Quote Originally Posted by mesan123 View Post
    Hi All...this is regarding H1b visa stamping....Planning to visit india in Sep.As my h1b expires in Jan 2012, company informed me to get H1b extended before travelling to india and i got the extension also approved today...BUT there was an issue...USCIS gave my extension Approval date from JAn 2012 till Jan2015. So technically i have, two I-797 now...i am confused now which I-797 shuld i submit when i go for visa...will having 2 i-797 be issue for them to issue visa...did any one in this form faced this issue b4...please let me know what to do
    mesan, they "should" issue you through Jan 2015. Whether they will do it? I don't know. But as Veni said, your 797s prove that you will be in status throug Jan 2015 which make you eligible for that much visa.
    I no longer provide calculations/predictions ever since whereismyGC.com was created.
    I do run this site only as an administrator. Our goal is to improve clarity of GC process to help people plan their lives better.
    Use the info at your risk. None of this is legal advice.

    Forum Glossary | Forum Rules and Guidelines | If your published post disappeared, check - Lies and Misinformation thread


  24. #24
    Thank You Q & Veni

    Quote Originally Posted by qesehmk View Post
    Veni

    Sorry I meant to respond to you but havent been able to so far. Pls bear w me for a day more max.




    mesan, they "should" issue you through Jan 2015. Whether they will do it? I don't know. But as Veni said, your 797s prove that you will be in status throug Jan 2015 which make you eligible for that much visa.

  25. #25
    Hi mesan123 (aren't you the infamous n*5 + 123?) jk

    I can help you with this:
    First, I would suggest that you think and rethink before planning to go for visa stamping.Almost all of the people I know who had gone back to India for stamping have been stuck there for more than 3 months or so under admin processing.So unless you have a compeling reason to do this, I would suggest to avoid. If you do have a valid visa right now on your passport (and depending on your travel back date), I would suggest to use that valid visa to re-enter instead of applying for visa extension at the consulate.

    Second, if you are still planning to go for visa, you can submit BOTH the current and new petition at the consulate. I had done the same back in 2008. On the form, I had mentioned the current petition and when I went to the consulate i submitted both of them. Once the officer said my visa is approved, I asked him what the expiry date would be for the visa. He confirmed that it would be according to the new petition. This was back in 2008 - who knows whether they will care to even respond nowadays.

    Good luck...

    Quote Originally Posted by mesan123 View Post
    Hi All...this is regarding H1b visa stamping....Planning to visit india in Sep.As my h1b expires in Jan 2012, company informed me to get H1b extended before travelling to india and i got the extension also approved today...BUT there was an issue...USCIS gave my extension Approval date from JAn 2012 till Jan2015. So technically i have, two I-797 now...i am confused now which I-797 shuld i submit when i go for visa...will having 2 i-797 be issue for them to issue visa...did any one in this form faced this issue b4...please let me know what to do

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •