They didn't let loose even President in the matter of BC. I feel happy atleast we have an option for additional documents like affidavits . I am imagining Trump in the place of Alejandro Mayorkas![]()
They didn't let loose even President in the matter of BC. I feel happy atleast we have an option for additional documents like affidavits . I am imagining Trump in the place of Alejandro Mayorkas![]()
From the workload point of view, with the finite number of officers and resources, it really does not make any difference to USCIS after a point.
e.g. If USCIS can process 100 applications a day with its resources, it does not really make a difference to them whether they receive 150 or 200 or 500 applications. They will just be processing the applications at full speed every day for a few days longer. It only helps them if the dates don't move even if the number of applications fall under 100 (Read - retrogressed dates even after all the available cases are adjudicated).
With the rapid movements of the past few months, I am sure USCIS has enough applications to make them work full steam already. Having any more applications will just increase the stack and not really make them any more busy.
The concurrency itself is also not much of an issue. Most of the people, who get their labor cleared, file for I140 almost immediately anyways. They don't have to wait for the dates to be current. So, from that perspective, USCIS cannot avoid getting I140s from people whose priority dates are not current yet.
I guess the main issue, about making the dates current, is about getting I485 applications from candidates whose priority dates span a huge time period. Once the application hits USCIS, because multiple officers divide the work-load amongst themselves, an application with a much later priority date say 1/1/2012 may get approved while person from 5/1/2009 is still being processed, creating much uproar.
Gradual approach by CO is, therefore, probably a request from USCIS to keep as much processing sequential (in the order of PD) as possible..
Just my thoughts ..
Last edited by pdfeb09; 02-23-2012 at 02:45 PM.
PD: 10.16.2009|| Current 2.1.2012 || RD: 02.29.2012 || ND: 03.02.2012||FP Date : 04.17.2012||EAD/AP Approval : 04.06.2012||EAD/AP Received :04/12/2012||
I had a similar question a month back even though my date (06/2011) is unlikely to be current anytime soon. I posted my question on all the forums and only Ron responded. You can see the thread: http://www.immigration-information.c...040&highlight=
Basically, Ron said go ahead with CP pay the fees and if the dates do retrogress then you could also do AOS. Keep in mind you will forfeit the CP fees.
In your case, if you do not mind travelling to India for an interview and obtaining police clearance certificates then you should proceed with CP. It is likely most of the pre-processing will be done before your date becomes current and you will be able to schedule interview once the date becomes current. Once that happens Retrogression will have no impact on you.
God has answered my prayers.
Have received the CPO mails for both me and wife. No RFE even though the place of birth in the passport is different from the BC for wife. We have included the affidavits from her mom and dad.
It is a great feeling and relief to know that we can now go for India vacations with out worrying about the stamping and port of entry questions. Already started browsing for ticket prices. :-)
EB2I NSC | PD: 08/07/2009 | Forum Glossary
http://youtu.be/h0b5VGrKVG4 -- GC Journey in KOLAVERI Song!!!!!
*************************************************
PD - 9/25/2008, RD - 1/5/2012, ND - 1/9/2012, EAD/AP - approved for self/wife n waiting for kids AP, FP Notice - 2/4, FP Date - 2/21 FP Done - Completed, 485 RFE for Self on EVL, RFE in review state from 3/28, 485 Approval - Dont know when ??
Now its my turn.....
Got it.. 5 minutes ago.
SRC1290068***
MS - YES
COMPANY - RETAIL - NON IT (MIDSIZE - 10K EMP)
H1B - 7 YEARS
WITH SAME COMPANY - WAS WITH ANOTHER COMPANY FOR 5 MONTHS SINCE THEN WITH SAME EMPLOYER
ISSUE - 221(G) In 2011 , Site visit in 2011
Other issue - No.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SC: TSC, PD:05Jan2008/EB2I, I140-30June2008, I485 mailed:02Dec2011, ND: 09DEC2011, FP Notice: 04Jan2012, FP Complete:? EAD/AP:03Feb2012,GC: 23Feb2012
I am trying to understand the following line from http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/homesec/R42048.pdf
While it is possible that USCIS may be holding on to some approved I-485 petitions, the National Visa Center caseload is the data that drive the priority dates published in the Visa Bulletin each month.
I was always under impression that qualified applications from USCIS are counted towards the demand data along with NVC applications.
Can someone please explain this to me?
Thanks.
My PD is June 2011 and I have received Fee Notice from NVC. Just this morning I had replied to someone with Oct 2010 saying I do not expect it anytime soon![]()
desperately waiting for next months bulletin. havent visited india in 5 years
EB2I ; PD: August 13 2010; Filed 485: ??; RD: ??; ND: ??; FP: ??; EAD/AP Approval:??; 485 Approval:??
Kd, are'nt you Dec or Jan filer? I thought 2008 is your Pd/year, likewise immi2910. 29/10 - birthday?
There are currently 15 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 15 guests)