Page 179 of 321 FirstFirst ... 79129169177178179180181189229279 ... LastLast
Results 4,451 to 4,475 of 8002

Thread: EB2 Predictions (Rather Calculations) - 2012

  1. #4451
    Quote Originally Posted by rasknorr View Post
    I am not against to your prediction. But still OP's comments needs to take into cosideration - can't be move to an entire year.. If you words are correct i (PD 9/2/10) will be one of the lucky guy. Hope for the best..

    Question - is there any trend that after the inv. data how soon the VB released? just curious..

    All the best to every EB2 waiters.
    Sometimes it gets released on the same day (max a day or two later). Maybe the VB will be released this afternoon.

  2. #4452
    Sophomore
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    22
    Thanks mysati

  3. #4453
    Quote Originally Posted by Kanmani View Post
    Considering the fact that 2008 PDers are taking their own time to file and also Jan - March 2008 PDers were current a month before than rest of 2008, I guess 800 per month would be the final score (I) for the year 2008.
    Another theory - With dates being current in 2007, a lot of people raised hell to have their apps started in 2007 (including me). With the dates retrogressing in July 07, these applications that were started would still be reflecting in higher demand going into late 2007 early 2008 and that is what we are seeing. More or less all PWMBs.

  4. #4454
    Quote Originally Posted by Kanmani View Post
    Considering the fact that 2008 PDers are taking their own time to file and also Jan - March 2008 PDers were current a month before than rest of 2008, I guess 800 per month would be the final score (I) for the year 2008.

    Vishnu, asankaran, smugymba and all others all the best . I think there is a good chance for a whole year movement.

    Mesan sis , lets wait for your turn, who knows , you could also get it by this month itself. fingers crossed.
    This data does not make any sense. Why would sep07 and oct07 have more filings than nov07 and dec07. I think the December filers have not been counted fully. I would go with 1300 to 1500 per month at least till march 2008. Anything less than that doesn't seem right.

  5. #4455
    Before July 2007

    No.of EB2 I-485 filings equal to number of perms.
    Definetly based on Teddy calculation this holds good till Nov'2007
    at it was down .7 This reason is simple many people with I-140 approved who changed jobs post july 2007 rushed to start their GC process again this caused demand reduction of 25% to 30% this is not big number.

    post Nov'2007 is interesting from this period no.of cases may average ~700 per month till Mid 2008 . from mid 2008 to late 2009 the number of filing may average ~500 month.
    This is the period demand destruction goes to .5 with Eb3 to EB2 upgrades. Most of these upgrades are in 2008 & 2009. Eb3 people whose date is current taken up to their case to port to EB2 so they get green card ASAP.


    How ever we gusestimate EB2 data as below
    2007 - 7605
    2008 - 84000 (12*700)
    2009 - 7500 (12*500) with increase numbers in last Quarter of 2009

    so we may still have 25K cases before Jan 1st 2010.

    EB1 - 15,600
    EB2 ROW - 12,000
    EB2 Mexico, Phil, china - 8,000 ( china excluded in above calculation)

    so we have 35, 600 ==> non EB2 India & EB1

    we have 86K ( EB1 & EB2 quota for FY 2012 with spill over from EB5)

    as of Jan 19th with VO numbers 36% already used so 86 - 31 = 55K available quota.

    assuming all 35, 600 are approved still we have 20K spillover. ( cases filed in EB1 & EB2 ROW from now will stay in pipeline few may get approved but at the same time more that from 35,600 will stary in pipeline).

    we apply 20 K spillover for 25K demand till Dec'2009 , Most of the cases will be cleared.

    By above analysis we can conclude USCIS pieline post sept'2012 will be ( EB1 & EB2 ROW from Feb'2012 & 5k from EB2 India), this pipeline is not good enough for post sept'2012 so more cases need in the system before that. always we have 25K inventory for EB1 & EB2 ROW in past reports now with India & china included don't cross this number. so VO is moving dates on numbers & on the system how it works.

    Even based on PERM estimates we have 50K Perm's between July 2007 to Dec 2009. demand destruction is 50% this is what VO mentioned. It is reasonable.
    before 2007 we don't have issues like porting & re-starting GC process gain. Earlier Once applied people used to wait for GC with their company. now due to 4-5 years delay people changed jobs after I-140. Most cases spouse also started GC process to renew H1 after 6 years.
    5% filling I-485 late
    20% EB3 to E2 porting last 3-4 years together 12K cases ported.
    20% restarting GC after changing job with I-140
    5% additional denails in I-140 stage, loosing job, leaving country.
    Last edited by srividya; 02-03-2012 at 11:57 AM.

  6. #4456
    Quote Originally Posted by natvyas View Post
    Based on these numbers can the gurus predict the green card issuance cut of date?

    Are these numbers for documentarily qualified applicants?
    As Far As I understand.. these number are NOT NECESSARILY "Documentarily Qualified" .. these numbers are I 485 applications received by USCIS, and have not been allocated a GC yet for various reasons (RFEs, have not yet processed completely, etc.), arranged by Priority Dates.

    Some, Very few, of all these applications would be documentarily qualified if any at all. At least not at the time the snapshot was taken.

    Gurus can correct me if I am wrong.
    Last edited by pdfeb09; 02-03-2012 at 11:54 AM.

  7. #4457
    [QUOTE=srividya;20424]Before July 2007

    No.of EB2 I-485 filings equal to number of perms.


    Have you accounted for cases approved quickly which never show up in Inventory?

  8. #4458
    Yoda
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    369
    My personal opinion: If CO moves PD in March 2012 based on the inventory, he should move it by 1 year atleast.

    Reason:
    a. EB2 as a whole has 30.5K applications.
    b. The year 2008 from EB2IC added only 5K applications.
    c. Granted that Inventory does not have 2009 data.
    d. But looking at 2008 if we assume 2009 will also add 5K applications.
    e. Total EB2 will be little less than 36K.
    f. Total EB2 that will be documentarily qualified will be 31K (little less than 15% I485 rejection rate). So total EB2 Demand as of Feb 2012 VB 32K.
    g. EB2 as whole usually gets 40K quota + 10K from EB1+EB5+EB4. Even if we assume 5K from EB1+EB5+EB5. Number of applications needed for FY 2012 for EB2 is 45K.
    h. So USCIS still needs 14K documentarily qualified applications for FY2012 for EB2 as a whole. That turns out to be about 16.5K I485s.
    i. Therefore to get 16.5K I485 applications, CO has to move the dates by atleast 1 year (infact they have to make it current if we go by the 2008 I485 count of 5K)

    NOTE: I know that there are many people with PD in 2008 that have not applied and hence we see low numbers but Mr. CO does not have a way to see that.


    Feel free to tear my logic apart.

  9. #4459
    You need to take into account
    1. AOS Cases that does show up any time in inventory and consume VISA
    2. CP cases

    As it is already 4th month in FY, a good percentage of Spillover ( QSP) already consumed.

    Quote Originally Posted by skpanda View Post
    My personal opinion: If CO moves PD in March 2012 based on the inventory, he should move it by 1 year atleast.

    Reason:
    a. EB2 as a whole has 30.5K applications.
    b. The year 2008 from EB2IC added only 5K applications.
    c. Granted that Inventory does not have 2009 data.
    d. But looking at 2008 if we assume 2009 will also add 5K applications.
    e. Total EB2 will be little less than 36K.
    f. Total EB2 that will be documentarily qualified will be 31K (little less than 15% I485 rejection rate). So total EB2 Demand as of Feb 2012 VB 32K.
    g. EB2 as whole usually gets 40K quota + 10K from EB1+EB5+EB4. Even if we assume 5K from EB1+EB5+EB5. Number of applications needed for FY 2012 for EB2 is 45K.
    h. So USCIS still needs 14K documentarily qualified applications for FY2012 for EB2 as a whole. That turns out to be about 16.5K I485s.
    i. Therefore to get 16.5K I485 applications, CO has to move the dates by atleast 1 year (infact they have to make it current if we go by the 2008 I485 count of 5K)

    NOTE: I know that there are many people with PD in 2008 that have not applied and hence we see low numbers but Mr. CO does not have a way to see that.


    Feel free to tear my logic apart.

  10. #4460
    Quote Originally Posted by skpanda View Post
    My personal opinion: If CO moves PD in March 2012 based on the inventory, he should move it by 1 year atleast.

    Reason:
    a. EB2 as a whole has 30.5K applications.
    b. The year 2008 from EB2IC added only 5K applications. <---- Incorrect! Inventory is as of Jan 12, 2012 so not all 2008 applications are reflected in the inventory
    c. Granted that Inventory does not have 2009 data.
    d. But looking at 2008 if we assume 2009 will also add 5K applications.
    e. Total EB2 will be little less than 36K.
    f. Total EB2 that will be documentarily qualified will be 31K (little less than 15% I485 rejection rate). So total EB2 Demand as of Feb 2012 VB 32K.
    g. EB2 as whole usually gets 40K quota + 10K from EB1+EB5+EB4. Even if we assume 5K from EB1+EB5+EB5. Number of applications needed for FY 2012 for EB2 is 45K.
    h. So USCIS still needs 14K documentarily qualified applications for FY2012 for EB2 as a whole. That turns out to be about 16.5K I485s.
    i. Therefore to get 16.5K I485 applications, CO has to move the dates by atleast 1 year (infact they have to make it current if we go by the 2008 I485 count of 5K)

    NOTE: I know that there are many people with PD in 2008 that have not applied and hence we see low numbers but Mr. CO does not have a way to see that.


    Feel free to tear my logic apart.
    Please see my point in blue. It is expected that another ~25K applications will be added between Jan 12 and Feb 29 2012 for EB2IC with PDs between 15 March 2008 and 1 Jan 2010. You have to also include 8.5K EB2IC approved in October 2011 that came from this year's quota.
    Last edited by kd2008; 02-03-2012 at 12:17 PM.

  11. #4461
    Yoda
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    369
    Hmm.. makes sense. Thanks!

    I think EB2 has already consumed 15K (due to QSP). CP cases will be less than 5K. So at this point the inventory has just about the applications that we need for FY2012. With 5K added further for 2009.

    Mr. CO may just move by 6 months to a max of 1 year just to be safe.


    Quote Originally Posted by needid View Post
    You need to take into account
    1. AOS Cases that does show up any time in inventory and consume VISA
    2. CP cases

    As it is already 4th month in FY, a good percentage of Spillover ( QSP) already consumed.

  12. #4462
    Yoda
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    369
    See my note in the original post.

    Mr. CO has no way to know how many have applied and how many have not. Also based on his experience he may know that most people who apply when they are current they do it within the 1st week.

    I know that there are definately more than 15 applications in 2008. Its just that nobody has to way to find that out at this point of time.



    Quote Originally Posted by kd2008 View Post
    Please see my point in blue.

  13. #4463
    Quote Originally Posted by skpanda View Post
    See my note in the original post.

    Mr. CO has no way to know how many have applied and how many have not. Also based on his experience he may know that most people who apply when they are current they do it within the 1st week.

    I know that there are definately more than 15 applications in 2008. Its just that nobody has to way to find that out at this point of time.
    Yeah, he may not see it but he is not stupid either. So please try to understand the point I am trying to make. You cannot assume 5K for 2009 and then proceed on with the calculations in the way you have done.

  14. #4464
    Yoda
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    369
    I missed the 'already allocated GCs' in FY 2012 and CP. So my calculations are off.

    I hope Mr. CO does not take chances and moves dates by atleast 6 months. Good luck to all!!


    Quote Originally Posted by kd2008 View Post
    Yeah, he may not see it but he is not stupid either. So please try to understand the point I am trying to make. You cannot assume 5K for 2009 and then proceed on with the calculations in the way you have done.

  15. #4465
    The pending inventory is updated on Jan 12. Mr CO said he will move the dates another six months around Jan 24th. Doesn't he know the pending inventory status by then before making the statement?

    I wish the dates cover entire 2010.

  16. #4466
    QBF - I agree with what Mesan is saying. Your employer has been horrible to you - leave at the first opportunity you have.
    Quote Originally Posted by mesan123 View Post
    180 days counts from day you get EAD or 485 reciept no. that part i am not 100% sure. you dont need to wait till you get your GC. incase you have EAD. count 180 days from the time you got your EAD and if your near that, you can file AC21 and take that job. that is legal and your not doing anything wrong by doing so...gurus correct me if i am wrong...
    EB2I NSC | PD: 08/07/2009 | Forum Glossary

  17. #4467
    Demand for 2008 does not include ppl who have their GC approced. How many are they?

    Quote Originally Posted by skpanda View Post
    My personal opinion: If CO moves PD in March 2012 based on the inventory, he should move it by 1 year atleast.

    Reason:
    a. EB2 as a whole has 30.5K applications.
    b. The year 2008 from EB2IC added only 5K applications.
    c. Granted that Inventory does not have 2009 data.
    d. But looking at 2008 if we assume 2009 will also add 5K applications.
    e. Total EB2 will be little less than 36K.
    f. Total EB2 that will be documentarily qualified will be 31K (little less than 15% I485 rejection rate). So total EB2 Demand as of Feb 2012 VB 32K.
    g. EB2 as whole usually gets 40K quota + 10K from EB1+EB5+EB4. Even if we assume 5K from EB1+EB5+EB5. Number of applications needed for FY 2012 for EB2 is 45K.
    h. So USCIS still needs 14K documentarily qualified applications for FY2012 for EB2 as a whole. That turns out to be about 16.5K I485s.
    i. Therefore to get 16.5K I485 applications, CO has to move the dates by atleast 1 year (infact they have to make it current if we go by the 2008 I485 count of 5K)

    NOTE: I know that there are many people with PD in 2008 that have not applied and hence we see low numbers but Mr. CO does not have a way to see that.


    Feel free to tear my logic apart.

  18. #4468
    Quote Originally Posted by kd2008 View Post
    Teddy, yes, indeed. USCIS is known to bungle its math, so I wouldn't be surprised if it revised its estimates. my expectation is:

    USCIS expected PERM approvals x 0.97 (EB2 I -140 approval rate) x 0.7 (for EB2:EB3 split) x 2.125 as its filing numbers. It ended up getting half of this. So an overall OR may be 0.7215
    My message from Jan 23. Looks like from what Spec estimated it is ~0.6 for I and ~0.7 for C from the latest inventory. Good enough? Thanks to Teddy, Spec, Veni, Q and others!

  19. #4469
    A quick and interesting observation - though not directly related to EB2 situation. EB3C has a PD of Dec-01, 2004 - and according to the inventory, they only have only about 1700 EB3C cased between Dec-04 and Jul-07. So EB3C is likely to see really rapid movement in coming months and may cross the 07/07 threshold perhaps this FY and enter uncharted territory similar to the EB2I's present situation. It is amazing to see the speed with which the immigration landscape is changing.
    EB2I NSC | PD: 08/07/2009 | Forum Glossary

  20. #4470
    Quote Originally Posted by pdfeb09 View Post
    As Far As I understand.. these number are NOT NECESSARILY "Documentarily Qualified" ..
    Some, Very few, of all these applications would be documentarily qualified if any at all. At least not at the time the snapshot was taken.
    Gurus can correct me if I am wrong.
    That's what I am thinking.

    Quote Originally Posted by Gclongwait View Post
    This data does not make any sense. Why would sep07 and oct07 have more filings than nov07 and dec07. I think the December filers have not been counted fully. I would go with 1300 to 1500 per month at least till march 2008. Anything less than that doesn't seem right.
    Yes. That would make more sense to me. I just find it very hard to believe that EB2IC demand in entire 2008 was less than 1000. That's absolutely ridiculous.
    I no longer provide calculations/predictions ever since whereismyGC.com was created.
    I do run this site only as an administrator. Our goal is to improve clarity of GC process to help people plan their lives better.
    Use the info at your risk. None of this is legal advice.

    Forum Glossary | Forum Rules and Guidelines | If your published post disappeared, check - Lies and Misinformation thread


  21. #4471

    Questions & Answers: Pending Employment-Based Form

    http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/usc...00082ca60aRCRD

    This article from USCIS should resolve many doubts about what is to be expected from Pending 485 inventory report. This was posted earlier, but could not find it.

    An important paragraph:
    "The “Pending Employment-Based Form I-485 Report,” displays the total number of pending adjustment of status applications, per preference classification. The report shows how many pending adjustment of status (green card) applications in each preference classification have priority dates in a given month and year. You can use this chart to determine how many applicants in your preference classification have priority dates in the same month and year as your own. Also, you can determine how many applicants in your preference classification are ahead of you in line for a visa number by adding together the number of cases with an earlier priority date than your own."

    Hence, my take is, these are just applications who have been accepted and receipt generated. Any public report like this will always be a bit behind in the timeline, and the most upto-date current data, would only be for internal stakeholders. This being said, some numbers do look quite low.

    See the USCIS article completely, it contains answers to questions like: : What does this pending inventory report contain?

    ps: I can imagine suninphx dancing somewhere, he was the original proponent of the huge demand destruction theory.
    Last edited by nishant2200; 02-03-2012 at 01:05 PM.
    I am not a lawyer, and it's always best to consult an immigration attorney.

  22. #4472
    Quote Originally Posted by pdfeb09 View Post
    As Far As I understand.. these number are NOT NECESSARILY "Documentarily Qualified" .. these numbers are I 485 applications received by USCIS, and have not been allocated a GC yet for various reasons (RFEs, have not yet processed completely, etc.), arranged by Priority Dates.

    Some, Very few, of all these applications would be documentarily qualified if any at all. At least not at the time the snapshot was taken.

    Gurus can correct me if I am wrong.
    I was wondering the same. How come people post March-2008 who filed on/after jan 1st got entire process completed by Jan 12th? Is NSC that fast (considering TSC is one-golden-egg-a-day speedwise)?

  23. #4473
    Quote Originally Posted by Spectator View Post
    A very quick look at the data, for months that might be complete, suggests an Overall Ratio of 0.6 for India and 0.7 for China, compared to the 0.8 I have been using.

    I think it is early days to draw conclusions and I will have a better look as time permits.
    Quote Originally Posted by qesehmk View Post
    That's what I am thinking.


    Yes. That would make more sense to me. I just find it very hard to believe that EB2IC demand in entire 2008 was less than 1000. That's absolutely ridiculous.
    The inventory is as of Jan 12, 2012, Q. It has data till March 15, 2008 PDs (Dec bulletin)+ some beyond that (1 week or so of Jan bulletin). So EB2IC 2008 demand is not completely reflected in the inventory.

  24. #4474
    This link has full details about

    AC21 - Change of Employer

    http://www.murthy.com/news/UDac21qa.html


    Quote Originally Posted by imdeng View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mesan123 View Post
    180 days counts from day you get EAD or 485 reciept no. that part i am not 100% sure. you dont need to wait till you get your GC. incase you have EAD. count 180 days from the time you got your EAD and if your near that, you can file AC21 and take that job. that is legal and your not doing anything wrong by doing so...gurus correct me if i am wrong....

  25. #4475
    Quote Originally Posted by Gclongwait View Post
    This data does not make any sense. Why would sep07 and oct07 have more filings than nov07 and dec07. I think the December filers have not been counted fully. I would go with 1300 to 1500 per month at least till march 2008. Anything less than that doesn't seem right.
    Actually it does make very good sense. Seeing the date movement in 2007, a lot of people had started their applications to get on the boat in 2007. When the boat left without them, all the applications that were started still hit the queue. Starting in Oct 07, DOL started the massive audit drive. I don't know the exact statistics of how many were audited but I remember from personal experience that they were a substantial percentage. The rejection rates for the audited applications was quite high and that would be reflected in and explain low Nov, Dec 07 filings.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 14 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 14 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •