
Originally Posted by
Spectator
Nishant,
July 2007 was about lack of "Documentarily Qualified Demand" and DOS not believing that USCIS could adjudicate sufficient numbers as far as I am aware.
Going back to when the "new interpretation" started, I would concede that it is possible that it started in FY2007, but EB2 didn't see significant benefit until FY2008.
If you look at FY2007, EB1 received 26,806 visas, EB4 4,794 and EB5 793.
The available numbers to EB were 147,148 visas plus 7,312 recaptured visas.
If we just use the 147k figure, that means the EB1 allocation was 43,084 and the EB4 & EB5 allocation was 10,448 each.
Theoretical Spillover visas from EB1/4/5 would have been (43,084-26,806) + (10,448-4,794) + (10,448-793) = 31,587
Extra numbers from EB2-non IC raised this to 35,379.
EB2-C received 6,797 total visas in FY2007
EB2-I received 6,204 total visas in FY2007
EB3 received 77,667 visas in FY2007. Of those, EB3-I received 17,985 visas. It is possible there simply weren't enough EB2 cases that could be adjudicated in FY2007. It is slightly puzzling to understand how EB3-I could receive so many visas, unless EB-non IC also ran out of cases that could be adjudicated as well.
In FY2008, theoretical Spillover was 27,602.
EB2-C received 3.7k Spillover
EB2-I received 11.5k Spillover
In addition EB2-ROW used 11.4k Spillover and some were wasted.
EB3 approvals were in line with the total visas allocated to EB3.