I am still trying to wrap my head around the movement in last VB. Somehow the whole thing is not sitting well with our well established impression of CO/DoS as being ultra-conservative in their approach. If we think through the timeline, this is what happened:
1. Early Summer 2011, low demand from EB1 prompted admission of large SOFAD and early PD movement.
2. PD movements continued to be aggressive until USCIS found some extra demand
3. PD stalled at the end of FY and we fail to cross 07/07
4. CO goes for Quarterly SOFAD in the new FY and also recognizes the need for building inventory for the coming SOFAD
5. Oct, Nov, Dec VB (movement up to 15-Mar-08) was measured movement for building inventory only
6. Gets info on low number of applications against Oct and Nov VB Bulletin (upto PD 01-Nov-07), pushes PD to 01-Jan-09 in Jab VB to account for low number of filings.
Except Step 6, everything else above is conservative. What has changed for CO to undertake a drastic 10 month PD movement? Especially since it is Jan VB and CO still has a couple of months to move PD and ensure that visa numbers are not wasted. Just saying its discretion does not cut it since the current action goes against what we have observed to be CO's primary approach.
If CO had been true to his approach, and needed PD to go to 01-Jan-09, then CO could have done 4 months in Jan, 4 months in Feb and 2 months in Mar. Why this hurry of 10 months in one shot? The explanation I have is that for whatever reason (demand destruction, building up to some inventory number, possibility of HR-3012), CO wants to go further than 01-Jan-09, that why this 10 month hit now and possibly another 6 months in Feb and 3 months in Mar (small chance). I still do not expect my PD (Aug-09) to be in line for being current this FY, but I imagine people in first half of 2009 better get all their documentation ready.