What determines whether a case should be filed at TSC or NSC? I am wondering why my lawyer choose to file at TSC?
Printable View
What determines whether a case should be filed at TSC or NSC? I am wondering why my lawyer choose to file at TSC?
RoosterC,
Jurisdictions listed here..
http://www.immihelp.com/directory/servicecenters.html
If you are referring to I-485 filing then the place where you live determines the service center.
NSC :
Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington, Wisconsin, Wyoming, Guam or the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands
TSC:
Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, U.S. Virgin Islands, or West Virginia
Detailed here : http://www.uscis.gov/i-485-addresses
I have been a silent reader of this forum for years and this is my first post. Thanks to all the gurus for their in depth analysis and contribution.
I just want to bring everybody's attention that a 2010 Feb EB2I PD has received RFE for medicals and EVL. It looks very odd. Is this just a one off instance?
http://www.trackitt.com/usa-discussi...009-matt-gurus
See Post # 5.
From most of predictions from the last bulletin ( release Jul 10)
it seems like Conservative is Mar 2009 and Wildly Optimistic is Nov 2009.
If we split the difference we get Jul 2009. In the next bulletin for September ( Upcoming Aug 10) I think there is a 50% chance we will get to this date with some + ve winds ( Slow approval speed, EB 2 ROW spillover)
and some -ve winds ( Extra #s for Chinese quote, Full utilization of EB5)
Considering that the difference between 01JUL2009 and 01NOV2009 is just ~6K visas (thinnest demand period in recent history), EB2ROW approvals continue to be very sluggish (just 21 trackitt approvals in July so far) with no recent pickup in pace, even EB2I approvals in July being very slow (less than 2K visas issued so far in July), many EB2I cases bogged down in RFE process (not yet received RFE, not yet replied to RFE etc) - CO is perhaps looking at a decent amount of leftover supply to be finished in the last VB of the year. Plus 01NOV2009 is a logical point given the RFEs - I am holding hope for a 01NOV2009 PD for EB2I in the Sept VB.
/Wishful Thinking!
All, I have a situation which is unusual, but may be someone has seen it before,
My 485 files in Feb 2012, My Priority Date is Dec-2008, last 2 years my case has not moved from status acceptance. I have not even received any RFE yet. I took an Infopass appointment and asked them what is going on, even they have no idea, they are saying write to Texas Service Center and ask them to expediate it as the priority date is current next month. I have requested my Lawyer to do so.
My EAD\AP was renewed twice without problem.
ANY ADVICE FROM ANYONE?
Thank you in Advance !!!
This is the first time in my recall that someone has reported Medical RFE for EB2I PD post 01NOV2009 - so I guess we gotta wait for some more evidence to emerge. The user who reported it does not seem to be a very active/established user - so lets wait and watch.
As a matter of pure numbers, a move to mid-2009 is sufficient. Crazy situations can make a move to late 2009 possible (and in my wishful thinking - more probable than possible). But to 2010 seems as a very very remote possibility. Apart from the one report, we don't have confirmation of RFEs for post 01NOV2009. Plus now its pretty late in the FY to *start* sending RFE for a new time period. Still - weirder things have happened!
Moving dates aggressively will only help to use up all visas if there was enough time to process all (+new) applications. This year is different as most applicants got RFEs and they need be processed. At this point, there is no dearth of pending applications, what is lacking is time/manpower to process all those applications/RFEs.
Thank you Q ! that's positive thinking, the other side is someone has not looked at it, my first 485 application was rejected saying priority date not current and was later accepted. Risk of not doing is waiting another year?
As of now there is no risk because you are still within the window of approval. If 2-3 months pass by since your date is current and you don't receive approval then it might make sense to call congressman / uscis etc etc. But for now - I wouldn't do anything if I were you.
Hi IMDENG,
If Sept'14 VB goes to Nov'09, what does it mean for you and me, considering our PDs are in Aug'09? I responded to the obvious RFEs on July 24 and my case status updated to "RFE Response received". I am not sure if that means we get a GC in x number of days, or if it means something else, or nothing at all.
Pre-adjudicated low hanging fruit scenario isn't applicable this year. If TSC has systematic problem(s) that can't be resolved in 2-3 months, CO has an option of moving dates aggressively in September because NSC is doing great. That way NSC can use up numbers and over all wastage can be minimized even as TSC filers will suffer. September 09' makes more sense now, doesn't it? :(
You are just a ray of sunshine, aren't you? :)
If dates move till Sept 2009 it will be the slow pace of overall approvals, that will drive that movement. CO has to make that call in the next 2 weeks. Now if there is something indeed broken at TSC, the USCIS will re-route applications. They do that now to balance workload. Also, it will be public info pretty quick. I don't really see much of a risk where too many 2009 people will get approved before 2008 ppl
Sure, I would be really interested to hear !
Thanks Q ! gives a lot of hope !
It means that we will be part of the lottery. Only a fraction of late 2009 folks will get greened in Sept (and perhaps Oct) this year (if indeed dates reach that far, big if). If we are not part of the lucky few, then we continue to wait until next summer.
The status of RFE RR does not mean anything more than the fact that USCIS has received your RFE Response. Nothing beyond that - no X days or anything - although they do mention a 60 day time frame in the status message.
LOL Thanks. I feel like I am asking 1+1 in a class full of Math PHDs. What I was trying to feel is that is there a possibility that the dates move to Nov'09 in the next two bulletins, and we still do not get greened (assuming no problems with the application) due to 'timing' reasons?
On a fun note, don't ask them, you could teach them 1+1, as higher level mathematics would mimic physics theorems. My core major is maths, not a PhD though.
Answer to your question, Yes . There is a good chance that we could be missed out, but we, late 2009 ers are keeping low profile on that thought, yet wishfully thinking (as imdeng says) we would get through this time !
I-485 Inventory is out. Any changes in calculations for date movement?
http://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/f...y-July2014.pdf
Inventory data is a floating data, so there can't me much read thru this data.
except that, we know for certain that there are Approx 5708 new cases are added in EB1, 2769 new cases in EB2 plus any new cases which were already approved in EB from April to July to the overall EB category.. which is approx 8477 plus already approved in last 3 months..
I know I am being impatient. But things aren’t looking too good for TSC. There is no precedent with TSC in last four year where they issued no/few GCs when dates were moved forward and they had approvable applications. I am not sure why everyone assumes TSC will just flip the switch one day and will start approving. It has never happened in the past.
Based on Trackitt data. (2012 is an odd year because demand went down to zero.)
Movement of PD * Bulletin * TSC Approvals
7 months 2010 July 176
5 months 2010 August 177
2.25 months 2010 September 123
1.75 months 2011 May 64
3.5 months 2011 June 118
4.75 months 2011 July 198
1.25 months 2011 August 81
3 months 2011 October 55
3.5 months 2011 November 29
4.5 months 2011 December 35
9.5 months 2012 January 76
12 months 2012 February 264
4 months 2012 March 308
0 Months 2012 April 4
40 months 2013 August 341
5.5 months 2013 September 440
0 months 2013 October 254
0 months 2013 November 138
45.5 months 2014 July 54
If dates are moved aggressively in September bulletin, it would be evidence that CO fears wastage by TSC and there won’t be any respite for TSC filers.
I think picture should be more clear first 2 weeks of August. Four months of movement in 2013 produced almost 1200 trackitt approvals from TSC. If dates don't retrogress before December, TSC has to produce 250-300 approvals a month in remaining four months. We should see daily 7-10 approvals daily in August, that will be enough to shut me up.