Originally Posted by
Pedro Gonzales
I agree that it is quarterly spill over (as I had repeatedly said would happen since the last VB came out), but I disagree with your conclusion that dates will move forward in the next VB.
It is quarterly spill over only because the visa numbers used are higher than the EB2I monthly allocation. CO has no way of estimating at this point in the year what the EB4, EB5, EB1 or EB2ROW usage is going to be, to authorize the spill over in the conventional sense. He simply used whatever excuse he had at his disposal (that based on the information available at that time, he had no way of estimating how far back to retrogress EB2I) to prevent EB2I retrogression as early as the October VB. I suspect that he wants to provide GCs to all EB2I (including pre 2007 porters) so that the current frontier truly moves to June 2008. That will happen by the end of the month (with the exception of post-2007 porters, who won't all get their GCs).
CO can't really use that excuse again this month, so he will probably have to retrogress EB2I now. The best case I can think of is holding dates steady if he can make the case that monthly EB3I to EB2I porting until June 2008 is minimal. Even if he does that, by the end of October, he'll know how much that flow is, so he'll still have to retrogress in the December bulletin. Either way, I see no forward movement this early in the year.
In the meantime, EB2I would still have used vastly more visa numbers in October than its monthly allocation (but perhaps I suspect less than its annual allocation). What this means is that come the end of the fiscal year (in summer 2014), there will still be the full spillover available to EB2I. In the meantime, we'll probably see EB2I retrogress to wherever EB3I is (to make monthly porter demand irrelevant).
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but I think it's better for you to be realistic.