Which dependent calculator u usedQuote:
Originally Posted by vsivarama
Uscis dependent calculator is
Eb2- 2.0 and eb3-2.1
Coz my number is around 44000 till December 2010 for both eb2 and eb3
Printable View
Which dependent calculator u usedQuote:
Originally Posted by vsivarama
Uscis dependent calculator is
Eb2- 2.0 and eb3-2.1
Coz my number is around 44000 till December 2010 for both eb2 and eb3
If you add up my EB2 & EB3 for 2009 and 2010 you get ~44000.Quote:
Originally Posted by longwaitgigu
I would say your calculations are on par and my basic calculations indicate FAD will reach DF if USCIS utilizes all the visa's. Basis for that is below.Quote:
Originally Posted by vsivarama
Hello, need help on my case.
I filed my 485 recently for me and my wife on my own. Instead of sending one package with 2 applications, i sent 2 packages separately for 2 applications. Does it cause uscis reject my wife 485 application? Any help on this is greatly appreciated.
USCIS needs to process the principal applicant before processing the derivative applicants if they are mailed separately. If your wife is a derivative applicant, then her application will be rejected if its processed before the principal applicants i-485. You may be able to resend the same application (if nothing has changed), once you get a receipt for your i-485. I would not be worried too much, as long as she has another way to maintain lawful status (such as H4, her own H1b, L1/L2, or F1/F2 etc). Good luck.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sudhedup1
Thank you. Hope they can match to primary.
Hello All,
Need your thoughts on my current dilemma. My EB2-I priority date is current for final action as of Oct 1st. I responded to an RFE for medicals & Sup J in November, 2018. My sup J was approved in Feb 2020, my medicals expire mid-November, 2020. I changed my job in August, 2019 and haven't ported my application to current employer. I am currently engaging with an external Fragomen attorney who had once helped me through one of my previous employers just to cover my basis if I get an RFE before approval comes through, as my current employer is suggesting to go with my own attorney as company attorney didn't initiate my AOS application and they will support an provide all paperwork. This attorney is advising me to file for Sup J rather than waiting for an RFE.
I was thinking what if my AOS application is approved while my Sup J application is in mail to USCIS. Positive could be it might get officers attention and quick action on my pending I-485. Any thoughts. As usual, your suggestions are highly appreciated.
thanks,
H
Read somewhere that new PERM cannot be started/processed if offices are closed, as notices need to be placed, and employees need to be able to see the notices.
Is this true ?
From my personal experience, the approval time for I485J was 2 to 3 months (before COVID). Normally all attorneys will wait for Supp J RFE, however your PD is current and your medical is about to expire. If I am in your situation, I might wait till the medical is expired (another month or so) and then you can go with new SuppJ. There is a *chance* that your application might be approved as it is. USCIS is not going to approve an application with expired medicals. You might ask your employer attorney what are the chances of application getting approved without a RFE. Explain what you are thinking and make a quick phone call. You can decide based on attorney opinion.Quote:
Originally Posted by harpreetbhatti
Don't worry a lot about RFE. Consider it as a progress in your case. Once an REF response is received, the GC approval comes quickly. You have waited so long. So another month or two (even though it is inconvenient) is no problemo. Nothing can go wrong in your case as you have attorneys supporting you. Cool down and Relax. Good Luck.
There was a clarification from DOL that notices can be placed on the door. See below.Quote:
Originally Posted by newyorker123
Quote:
Brandt Carter from the DOL Atlanta National Processing Center had clarified that – Posting Notice for PERM – If a business is all remote because of COVID, it’s okay to post notice on exterior door. This was posted in “Greg Siskind’s” twitter feed on 23JUL2020.
Please see:
https://twitter.com/gsiskind/status/1286363602178498561
Looks very reasonable assumptions to me. I like how you used 20,30,40% downgrades to be realisitic. My downgrade assumptions are more like 20,40,80 since any date out of FD in current bulletin for EB2 would wanna start this process asap given the h1b wage level adjustment mess. the only thing that will limit downgrades is misinformation or lawyers processing capacity -- but once this month passes, lawyers will have free time on their hands to work on downgrades and i do not expect dates to change in Nov bulletinQuote:
Originally Posted by vsivarama
The H1B wage shift is going to be temporary until the lawsuits are filed. This was just election time posturing for a sound bite saying see how we are protecting American jobs. When the lawsuit is filed and the changes are rolled back, there will be nary a peep about that.Quote:
Originally Posted by letmesee
+1. Very less likely it survives an imminent legal challenge, followed by a change of administration (potentially!). Odds are stacked against it from even going into effect to begin with even for a short window (given the target implementation date is 60 days).Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbulent_Dragonfly
Wage determination went into effect on October 8th. The 60 day window is for the H1-B speciality occupation rule which is a seperate rule.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zenzone
Anyone who files LCA/PERM or has a pending LCA/PERM on or after 8th october 2020 will need to be paid according to the new wage determination. It's a raise for everyone on H1-B :)
Yes. I meant the specialty occupation rue when I said 60 days and thanks for the clarification.Quote:
Originally Posted by inspired_p
ha! Needless to say that lots of ppl. will be bumped down in these new wage levels. For example, old L4 wage will now probably likely could be new L3 when you are up for next extension. In that case, its probably going to be okay still as long as the role itself is experienced and requires special/specific skills and education specific to it. However, if the increase in levels is too dramatic that an old L3 will now only qualify as a new L1, it might get tricky. One an still make the case that the new L1 is still around the median as such. So I think only time will tell how USCIS adjudicates using these new elevated levels.
There are also professions where wages are negotiated by union contracts. For example, tenured school teachers are paid that way. It will be interesting to see how those situations are approached. I personally have such friends who haven't had any RFE or rejection issues in the past (including the current DT admin.) as they were making the highest wages negotiated by their unions and everyone in the peer group in their school district made the same wage. What if those guys qualify only under the new L2 wage level for example.
My assumptions for 20% in 2009 and 2010 are obvious. The dates are current in EB2 till May 15th, so I figured I will up the number by 10% and another 10% for subsequent years. The reason I use 40% for 2012 and onwards, is because not everyone who can downgrade will downgrade.Quote:
Originally Posted by letmesee
i) They may not have employer support,
ii) The dates may not be current by the time their company attorney's get to it.
iii) I have known people who backed out because of the ability to pay clause where they were not offered the prevailing wages.
iv) May be unable to file because of employer change and PERM pending.
v) Most important of all, if USCIS extrapolates the trend to be around 40-50% people downgrading this month they will likely NOT allow the filing dates to remain current past this month. The purpose of FD is to estimate and allow cases to be filed which may be current by end of the FY 21. To provide AOS to backlogged folks is not it's goal.
I expect downgrades from 2012 onwards will reach 80% in couple of months. People could not file this month will be motivated by the coming visa bulletins.
What are you all thinking regarding release date of Nov Bulletin, this Fri or next?
I am guessing next weekQuote:
Originally Posted by Turbulent_Dragonfly
I am also thinking Filing dates will not be allowed by USCIS for the whole year. They will be open only for the next 2-3 months to get the applications in. After January they will rather move FADs based on the demand and processing bandwidthQuote:
Originally Posted by vsivarama
I am going by i140 approved
Which in year-2010-
Eb2- 15,313x2
Using dependent calculator- 30,626
Eb3-6682x2.1
Using dependent calculator-14,032.2
That is giving me 44,658.2
Thats just for 2010
Correct me if I am wrong
I agree with idliman, as it is highly likely that they will look for new medicals. If there is going to be an RFE before approvals, let them shoot it for both J and medicals or if it is going to be a straight approval, let them do it without J or medicals. Anyways it takes weeks to receive RFE hard copy and weeks to re-activate our case after we respond back.Quote:
Originally Posted by idliman
Hello Everyone - My PD is May 2010. EB3 approved 1st and then EB2 in 2017. Both with same employer. Does anyone think of any possible reason that EB2 may get me the GC before EB3? (Meaning is there any reason I must file in EB2?)
I would suggest filing using EB3 petition based on what my 'hunch' is. FAD for EB3 will stay 3-4 month ahead of EB2 and that will give you 3-4 months more where your case might get picked and approved.Quote:
Originally Posted by usvisas
Worst case scenario is that you don't see any benefit between EB3 vs EB2. There will be no harm done.
I am assuming that you have not filed for AOS so far. EB2I is 01SEP09. Assuming that aggressive movement means 2 or 3 months per bulletin, the FA dates movement will be along the following lines for EB2I.Quote:
Originally Posted by usvisas
Nov Bulletin - 01NOV09 (average) ; 01DEC09 (optimistic)
Dec Bulletin - 01JAN10 (average) ; 01MAR10 (optimistic)
Jan Bulletin - 01MAR10 (average) ; 01JUN10 (optimistic)
For EB3I, the PD is already at 15JAN10. Movement will be at a minimum of 3 months per bulletin. So you will be current in EB3I first. So you should go with EB3I.
I keep repeating this again and again. So one more time: One of the main benefits of filing I-485 is the 180 day AC21 clock from the date of filing. After 180 days, you essentially become a "free agent" and the law protects you from out of status type situation. You can take up any job in "same or similar" category.
From the above analysis, the benefits of going with EB3I are obvious for your case. Send your application ASAP. For people who had applied for GC, the first goal should always be the 180 day clock. If GC comes before that then it is an added bonus. Opting for EB3I will give you GC at least 3 months earlier than EB2I.
With your PD, don't worry about retrogression. You have very low chances of getting affected either with EB3I or EB2I.