The point that post is making is that, unused EBs don't make a change in total allocation numbers in FB. So for all practical purposes, total FB allocation is 226,000.Quote:
Originally Posted by gcconnect
Printable View
The point that post is making is that, unused EBs don't make a change in total allocation numbers in FB. So for all practical purposes, total FB allocation is 226,000.Quote:
Originally Posted by gcconnect
Received my receipts today. (sent on Oct 1st)Quote:
Originally Posted by 2011Feb
Now that there are many of us filing I-485 (AOS), does anyone know how USCIS decides to prioritize processing them? Is it FIFO or do they prioritize AOS based on applicants with current FAD?
Congratulations.. how many days after the check clearing did they send you the notice if I may ask?Quote:
Originally Posted by 2011Feb
Currently the only indicator that I have for acceptance is that the checks have cleared.
I would look at it the other way , If everyone were to send their Medicals then there will be further delays . If its not mandatory to send a doc to the USCIS then you might as well wait as sending more info delays things .Quote:
Originally Posted by srimurthy
Honestly they need the Medicals only when the Final Action dates get closer and I hope they ask for them only when Final action dates are close by as Medicals can anywhere between 500-1000 dollars today . For a family of 4 that will be 4K and most companies don't pay for dependents .
In 2012 I paid $250 , in 2018 it was $550 , just for the doc to sign a few pages . My friend paid 950 last month in the Bay area.
2-3 months of forward movement will not ensure effective utilization of the available visas.Quote:
Originally Posted by gcconnect
Eb2 has a nearly 10,000 with pending 485 for the last 8 years.
Lot of Eb3 applicants from 2009 end are already getting greened. There are no new applicants for Eb1, and 2 from ROW to use any of these numbers 3 will have limited demand that can be covered within a month or 2
I agree. There has to be 6 - 9 months of movement minimum for EB3. Maybe 3-4 months movement for EB2 though it would be great to have more movement to maybe even May 1, 2010 to ensure people who all filed in 2012 are greened.Quote:
Originally Posted by AceMan
This is provided USCIS/DOS does not want to keep visa numbers available for Consulate applications starting Jan 2021. If Consulates open on Jan 2021 then EB2- ROW & EB3-ROW which is current can receive more applications from outside the country. I believe they will keep some buffer for that possibility and will not move EB2-I and EB3-I on the basis of the demand vs visa availability seen currentlyQuote:
Originally Posted by Turbulent_Dragonfly
Seems to be in-line with my attorney's prediction that EB2 FAD will go forward by close to 6 + months. Let's hope so.Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbulent_Dragonfly
To me for Eb2-I, May-2010 is an important watermark as cases until then should be largely pre-adjudicated and good to go with a click.Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbulent_Dragonfly
Consular applications are going to be so hard to predict compared to AOS because of Covid. Worldwide cases are only ramping up now so I don't know what will prompt them to open up consulates.Quote:
Originally Posted by inspired_p
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
Could it be possible (wishful thinking) that they assigned visa number from last years lot ( so they don't go waste) and just advancing dates based on the assessment of work load they can manage due to COVID? In in November VB we may see a big jump, again wishful thinking...:)Quote:
Originally Posted by Zenzone
I think the numbers are there this fiscal, its all about USCIS having a strategy on how to allocate them and when to do it. EB2-I cases until May-2010 are clearly the low hanging fruits that can be cleared off right away. Also, remember that interviews could be waived too for many straightforward cases due to COVID. All in all, if you have a PD within the the first half of 2010 I would say you are sitting pretty and could even get greened by the Q1 of this fiscal. By then, the pipeline for H2 of 2010 should begin taking shape too. Also, if JB wins there is a possibility that the interviews for EB GC might be made optional based on case by case. Those are the tailwinds I see that could reduce the wastage of visas by a large extent. We all know what the headwinds are so tried pointing out the brighter side possibilities here.Quote:
Originally Posted by chhablsa
It is really astonishing that the November bulletin is not yet released on October 28th.
That tells me that the filing dates will be kept the same with USCIS continuing to honor them. The delay is really not a big impact then as there are no net new cases that need to be prepared and not a lot of surprise value to it as opposed to what we saw last month.Quote:
Originally Posted by AceMan
I don't think you should be astonished by anything this admin throws at you. I would not be astonished if they decided to release Nov visa bulletin in Dec. Remember when a few folks got H1 approvals with backdated dates?Quote:
Originally Posted by AceMan
If they integrate HK into the Mainland China quota for immigration purposes, they may need to carefully word that in the bulletin because trust me, lawsuits are going to be filed. It will be a fiasco if a lawsuit is filed and they have to reissue the bulletin with thousands of people already applying in the meantime. I don't think it's going to alter the numbers, but the language in the bulletin subtext could be what they are sweating out about.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2011Feb
checks were cleared on 21st. So it took a week to receive the receipt after checks en cashed.Quote:
Originally Posted by inspired_p
The possibility of not supporting filing dates any more for the month of November?Quote:
Originally Posted by Zenzone
I have a feeling that they want to wait till last minute. If they release early, Applicants will start or stop downgrading. If they release the dates tomorrow evening or Friday, flow will be normal.Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbulent_Dragonfly
I think USCIS will keep the filing dates and honor them in November. After all, why not for more fees when they already let ppl. apply for the 485 and associated benefits by filing in October? I don't see any practical incentive for them to stop it now. I won't be surprised if they honor filing dates in December too. However, I will be surprised if they further advance filing dates within Q1 though.Quote:
Originally Posted by AceMan
They clearly said this delay isn't because of the EB visa issues instead its about some language about Hong Kong and its legalities. So not sure why we still keep speculating about it.Quote:
Originally Posted by richie.rich
Noone has clearly states anything.. even the HK language reason is speculation. Anyways.. what else do we have other than speculating delay of visa bulletin ? Life ? Ha haQuote:
Originally Posted by Zenzone
how much in advance does USCIS send RFEs for the Final Action dates ? I am Dec 2009 and have not received any RFEs.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zenzone
Do they need the dates to be current before sending the RFEs ?
Zenzone, AILA statement as I read it referred to a generic dispute with language. It did not specifically say it was with regard to HK. HK Eo was passed in July. What the language dispute was about is still not completely certain, right ? Did I miss something?Quote:
Originally Posted by Zenzone