A question about spouse's 485 PD
Hi, guys, finally my employer filed 485 for me and my wife. I already got 485 receipts. I noticed one problem. My priority date is correct, but my wife's priority date is Dec.29, 2011, which is the received date. Could I contact USCIS to correct this issue? I noticed some other guys also found the same issue. I wonder whether we should all contact USCIS to correct it.
Question regarding stamping
Hi friends,
A hearty congratulations to all of those who are current. It is definitely a good feeling!
Have a unique question....not sure which thread to place it on....my wife is in India and has a valid H4 stamp on her passport. She did a change of status to H1 while in US and applied for H1 stamp in India. She received a 221g.
Question is if she withdraws her petition for H1, can the consulate cancel her H4 visa? Can she enter US on H4? I am presuming that entering on H4 will mean abandon of status for H1.
The reason for this is my priority date is current and I would her to be back in States rather than wait on her H1 stamp.
Thanks in advance!
Some rationale behind date movements
I think the reason the dates moved has 2 key reasons.
Reason 1
It is true that DOS isn't seeing enough demand. Majority of Pre-July-2007 cases are approved for EB2. Whatever remains is cases with some problems - major or minor. Then whatever was filed Oct onwards .... will not hit DOS until after at least 4 months i.e. January of 2012. That is the reason the dates did move until Feb bulletin since the movement for Feb bulletin is based on January Demand data.
So as soon as the Oct filed 485s will start hitting DOS, the movement is going to stop or worse get into reverse gear.
I am 100% confident that the reversal will come in 1 or max 2 months. i.e. Mar or April bulletin. Then the dates will retrogress to around Q1 2008 or even earlier. But on Sep 2012 the dates will be around Q1 2008.
Reason 2
However if CO had not given QSP then the dates didn't need to move until May 2012. and then he would have hit the proverbial cliff of Jul 2007. That's why he applied QSP in Q1. So the second reason is "INTENT" of building pipeline. Math is one thing. But there is intent to build pipeline now rather than hit the cliff and then be forced to build pipeline. But the way he is building pipeline is very wise. He most likely didn't make it current to avoid clobbering of system as well as avoid political backlash and criticism in this charged environment. However friends we should thank him for doing the right thing. He has moved it far enough to lessen pain for a lot of people as well as help the system assure steady supply of applications as well as do it within his bounds to avoid criticism.
ps. - I doubt if he will continue to apply QSP going forward. We will see.