Hope itz current....Everyone here will get EAD :) and GC in few years
Printable View
I was browsing through the posts someone being worried about the H1B extension. At the same time, I read about people with a E-V-C model (premium processing) get their H1 extensions until the date listed on the work order in 3 days with no RFEs. My friend in this model had applied for his extension (Regular processing) in May.. and is still waiting..
Not to belittle anyone's worries, but this is confusing. I was wondering, if situations are indeed that bad?
I read about the E-E RFEs also showing up for non-consulting jobs.My 7th year H1 extension is coming up on 10/31, and HR said that they would send out the paper work by 2nd/3rd week of September (they said they are waiting on some clarification for Q4 budgets).
1. Should I ask them to expedite the process?
2. Should I apply in premium processing??
My PD is 02/22/2008.. It would really really take a miracle for me to file for the I-485 this month.
Champu, you are more or less similar to the other person we have been discussing all this morning. Its hard to give you advice since not sure why they want to wait exactly. Budgets seems like a frivolous reason. May be the lawyer thinks you could be current and avoid H1 expense. But my advice would be to continue H1 regardless 485 is filed. So carefully nudge HR. Unfortunately HRs always behave as if they are the masters of the world.
It is just a thoery. This is a unique situation without any prececdant. So how DOS will handle is just a speculation. They may make exceptions similar to what they did in FY 2011. They allocated spillover in Q3 itself although by law/rule they should do it in Q4. So if they want they can make an exception to do SFM or BTM starting Oct 2011.
Guys, there could be few heart-aches here...with heart swinging like pendulum from both extremes.
please post ONLY credible information:) and limit the swings if possible :)
qblogfan, I respect you commenting very quickly without leading into much hype. TeddyK same with you...man hang in there...we will be through.
I always get a feeling that USCIS has a Sholay coin (both sides heads). It is always USCIS wins because they always call heads.. And look at this data '09/01/2007' this looks like the coin didnt fall either side its standing still vertical to the ground.. na udhar ka na eedhar ka...
Teddy 1 sep 2007 is end of my comfort zone for SFM. Anything after that must retrogress. That is the reason I liked the date. But as qbf pointed out it could be false. Rodnyb is my old friend from IV ;) Say hello to him.
immitrickz, last time your source said there won't be any movement for August bulletin and that didn't pan out quite well. But still thought if there is any information it would be useful to people.
BTM, SFM, et all..
Except for 2007 fiasco, which benefited a lot among us (including me), there never was any flood gates that got opened or any effort to build any movement. I also believe that 2007 July was because of several factors including the happenings at the time in terms of immigration debate, and not necessarily because of an intent to build any kind of movement. What makes us think that USCIS' only job is to process EB2I applications, and they do not have any work to do otherwise. Some of us have even suggested that that is indeeed the case (to keep USCIS busy). Let us remember that EB2IC is only one of the areas of work for USCIS. If indeed, 2800 odd visas are to be processed during a quarter (not too good at numbers), why would they need to build any kind of inventory in terms of pre-adj. I would rather argue that over time, USCIS has build efficiencies in the ways they would pre-process, so they would not need to build any kind of inventory at all. From what I have understood so far, what is remaining and it is significantly higher than any normal allocation, would take us a month further. In that case, is it not correct to say that at any time, to fulfil a quarter worth of allocation, they only need to advance the dates by a month or there abouts? Reason that collecting fee is also not really convincing because..H1B gives them more fee than 485+EAD together, and by the way, recently, H1Bs in a lot of cases are not being issued for a full 3 year term.
I do not wish to sound pessimistic nor trying to pour water on hopes of several on this thread. Just my opinion - take it for what it is worth
Thanks for the Reminder !! To be fair to my source, the movement differed by a month (Which definitely means a lot to most of us here) compared to huge forward movements predicted earlier for that bulletin . And no, i don't have any information to share this time around...
guys, did any of you had an DHS officer visit at your workplace regarding the H1B visa? Did they contact your consulting company later? what was the outcome?
This feel like the last over of India Vs. Pakistan (USCIS) match. The excitement is crazy.
We will see sep bulletin match statistics around 3:50 pm et .. :-)
This bulletin will be a big bumper :) I see people having very high hope and in the end it will be little movement with no comment...
There are currently 280 users online. 43 members and 237 guests
We still have a long way to go to break the record of 387.
Error on prediction is acceptable/understandable depending on the magnitude. But error on "insider information" hurts credibility. Wish your source provides first credible information sometime soon in future. I think you laid it out quite well. I agree with you a lot on this. The only thing is .. USCIS knows that every year there is Spillover and so they need to move dates by that much at a min to not let those visas go waste. Thats why BTM. SFM is what otherwise they do every month - move the dates by 0-1 weeks!