A legal thesis for not counting derivatives
Sorry, I didn't see it. Already posted here
This is a legal thesis for not counting derivatives
http://www.ilw.com/articles/2012,0201-endelman.shtm
Quote:
There is nothing here that explicitly authorizes or mandates the counting of family members under the preference quotas. While a derivative is “entitled to the same status, and the same order of consideration” as the principal alien, nothing requires that family members also be given their own numbers.
Quote:
(2) Entitlement to derivative status.
Pursuant to INA 203(d), and whether or
not named in the petition, the child or
spouse of an employment-based first
preference immigrant, if not otherwise
entitled to an immigrant status and
the immediate issuance of a visa, is entitled
to a derivative status corresponding
to the classification and
priority date of the beneficiary of the
petition.
But they conveniently forget the title of the section under which the above is described
Quote:
Subpart D—Immigrants Subject to
Numerical Limitations
So derivatives are subject to numerical limits! Argh! I dunno why they think it is not so. May be, Spec can elucidate me here.