I agree that the list of American misadventures and malicious actions is long and multi-faceted. It is true that history is full of violence and we certainly have less of it now than at any point in time in history. What I disagree with is the lore that America is/was the leader in spreading democracy, justice or peace. The deliberate propping up of dictators and autocrats throughout the world, the sabotaging of democratic governments in other parts of the world, the refusal to join the International Criminal Court, the preaching of human rights to others while carrying on with Guantanamo bay specifically designed to deny such rights, the frequent pardoning of the few Americans ever punished under American law for war crimes all militate against the supposed adherence to justice and freedoms. An objective analysis of history would argue against such self-serving assertion by Americans. If the argument is that they are no worse than everyone else, I would readily agree.
What made for one or more countries to prosper and dominate the world at one point of time or another is a complex analysis even though it may be expeditious for those countries to attribute it to some noble characteristics they assert they have (more than everyone else). The slave labor in the plantations is said to be the driver of American prosperity by some historians. The availability of vast unexploited natural resources is another. That is not deny the contribution of the industrial revolution. Often, success is about being in the right place at the right time. India and China dominated the world productivity until a couple of centuries ago.
https://www.newgeography.com/content...-two-countries The jury is still out on weather freedom and justice are the only recipe for prosperity. A case study of Singapore and growing prosperity in China would probably throw up interesting results to the contrary.